this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
436 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

7594 readers
1755 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In March, a girl’s stepfather took his own life after cops discovered that he had used Grok to create 7,000 sexually explicit images using one photo taken when his stepdaughter was 11 years old, the amended complaint alleged.

Grok allowed the man to generate extreme images depicting incest and rape without flagging any harmful behavior, the complaint said. Seemingly, xAI’s child safety system only intervened after the man input a prompt for “gang rape.” That request sent a CyberTip to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), which alerted law enforcement to the AI CSAM.

Yet the harm was not stopped then, either. Despite mandatory reporting requirements to share information like a user’s IP address when CSAM is flagged, xAI repeatedly refused to help cops or NCMEC identify the user, the complaint alleged. For weeks, xAI allegedly “obstructed this investigation at every turn” and made it harder for “law enforcement efforts to locate, identify, and apprehend the perpetrator.”

Eventually, the stepfather was arrested after cops obtained a warrant to seize his devices. That’s when “a forensic review revealed approximately 7,000 AI-generated images and videos” depicting his stepdaughter, which were allegedly produced using Grok. Without Grok providing users with easy access to “undressing” capabilities, his family doubts he ever would have generated the harmful images, which he allegedly trafficked online in trade for “CSAM produced by other child sex predators.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If he could prompt grok to produce say a hundred or so variants of a prompt, getting to 7k images might not even take that long..

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

I'd guess this is what he did, yeah.

"Make a few examples of this"

"i like number 3. Generate more as a set"

That kind of thing. Its pretty horrifying that s cloud-based model allows for this in the first place, even worse that he could likely generate large themed sets of them.

Edit: Worse when you realize he may have just used her as the basis because he didnt want to get caught for googling "pictures of 11yr olds" or whatever. Thats actually part of this Jane Doe's statement/claim, that the ease of access provided by grok to generate CSAM was a driver.