this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
506 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

8461 readers
398 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I personally would have blamed the cost of raising children myself ngl.

[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cost is like, towards the end of the list of why I wouldn't have kids. It's certainly there, but number 1 would probably be something like "I would never forgive myself for bringing another life into this shitty world unsolicited".

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Also pretty up there is "I'd have to grow it inside my body, and then move it outside my body".

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's also a personal choice. No, I'm not talking about a person being gay, but a lot of people don't mind being single. Or if they are partnered, they choose not to have any children. I personally fall in the former category.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm single and pretty much every single woman I met doesn't want kids. They just want to spend their money on travel and restaurants and they think kids, or even pets, will take away from that.

I don't get it, but I'm also not on social media hours a day watching influencers who glorify traveling and michelin star restaurants as the pinnacle of human achievement.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I fully understand why no one would want to willingly subject themselves to the current state of women's healthcare.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

In all fairness, if you have money, health care has never been better, women's or otherwise. The "if you have money" is an issue, though.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

they aren't poor. they are rich. they have the best healthcare and the best hospitals in the friggin' world. literally, the best hospital for maternity in the entire USA is about a 15m drive from my home.

your point would only make sense if it was in a rural area with poor incomes, which indeed, have awful healthcare outcomes and is the majority of america, sadly.

their issue is not healthcare access. it's that they spend 50K a year traveling and think it's unfair and awful and they want to spend closer to 500K a year traveling, and the idea of having to like, only travel twice a year and have a kid is unfathomable awful to them. even the richest mofos in USA basically think kids are too expensive even thought they can easily afford them.

meanwhile all my friends who have kids, don't travel at all and don't go out to expensive restaurants. funny that.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

True.

but also gay.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's also a major ethical issue with bringing a child into this doomed world

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The world is only doomed if you're poor.

If you have a few million in the bank, it's great and going to get even better.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

A few million? Nah, that is not being rich. A few billions, and then we're talking. Then we are starting to get into private island and bunker in New Zealand money. A few millions is just a successful lawyer, not-so-small business owner or someone who inherited a house in a good part of the town. They may be more than a cancer diagnosis away from poverty, but not by much.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In some ways sure, but our current ecological trajectory is pointed towards issues even fabulous wealth will only be able to mitigate.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it's not, but keep telling yourself that because it makes you feel smart and important, no doubt.

we will invent better crops dude. humans are incredibly successful at adapting to changing climate conditions, it's the reason our species is all over the fucking planet, even in the harshest environments.