this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
617 points (99.7% liked)
Fuck AI
8779 readers
1084 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- No misinformation.
- No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
- "The third image is a well-known anti-semitic trope"
- "Claiming that 'agentic AI' can outperform humans at all jobs is misinformation"
Less effective reports:
- "Breaks rules"
- "Misinformation"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I should do a bunch of google searches about myself and see if I can get its AI to say anything defamatory about me...
...in Germany.
Also see if it can give you incorrect medical advice, which is probably easier.
Am I pregernant?
With my 14th child?
In theory, supposing you could find a judge that wasn't too corrupt, it should play out the same way in the US. What can Google possibly hide behind? It's their in-house AI posting things on their own website. Who else can they point their finger at? Their only real defense would be to throw money at the problem.
Hahaha! No! It's the USA!
Free speech (or at least the American version of "I shouldn't face any consequences for saying nasty things", rather than "the government can't put me in prison for disagreeing with them") is sacrosanct, or at least it is for wealthy and important people, which in the USA includes multinational megacorps like Google.
So no, don't expect a US court to hold a US tech giant to account for saying a thing. The courts have been writing exemptions for Google from liability for decades. Why would they stop now?