this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
511 points (99.2% liked)

Fuck AI

7325 readers
1822 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 152 points 3 days ago (5 children)

People see this and think "AI is just generating a bunch of useless slop."

What they need to be thinking about is how much of our environment was destroyed to produce this useless slop.

Like, imagine all of those bullshit cheap plastic nic nacs that flood our oceans and landfills, times a million.

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Exactly this. It is not that AI generates meaningless slop, it also destroys the environment and increases costs to populations near data centers…

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Dont forget the decimated value of the houses nearby.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

It's a self solving problem. As soon as people pay the actual cost of AI, usage will drop automatically. It's just because investors are willing to burn money inflating the bubble is the resaon AI is being used as much as it is.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I knew we were truly fucked the moment I realized that even non-AI content on the internet is affected negatively by AI. Take this comment I'm typing out right now. I'm not using AI for it, but the content of what I'm writing is based on experiences I have had with AI - nothing is purely human made anymore.

At one point I had an issue with a tool and searched for it on the web and found someone who looked like a real person describing a similar-ish issue. They mentioned trying a setting but it didn't work for them. I thought "that setting seems to be what I need". I searched for that setting on the web and also in the codebase of that tool - zero matches. It was made up. I didn't use any AI myself, but I still wasted time with an AI hallucination.

Now every time I find something on the web I have to do additional searches to see how many other sources corroborate the information I get from any result. And eventually this too will be pointless.

It was made up. I didn’t use any AI myself, but I still wasted time with an AI hallucination.

And then it gets used as training data.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

More like, imagine all the aquaphors drained dry.

[–] crimson_iris@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

Not to be that guy, but aquifers.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Inference is about as cheap as playing a videogame.

There's certainly a lot of externalities to AI and enviro impact is absolutely one of them but this isn't a great point for it.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

I play vidya gaem ⏩ I have a pleasant time

AI does things ⏩ ...?

[–] j_z@feddit.nu 0 points 2 days ago

Not saying you’re not correct but I keep hearing, what I take to be at least slight overstatements, of how much environmental impact is caused by agentic ai but is there some good source where I can red up on exactly how much? While ”Plastic nic nacs that flood our oceans and landfills, times a million” is surely a good ballpark I’d like to narrow it down a bit