167
The uncritical adoption of AI in science is alarming — we urgently need guard rails
(www.nature.com)
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
That's a lot of ad hominem for someone so vocally against it.
If your entire argument is "look at this mistake that was made, why did we trust scientists in the first place?" (with some personal attacks thrown in) you're going to struggle to find a genuine conversation.
Scientists are people too, they aren't a homogeneous pool of unassailable morals/ethics and correctness.
People fuck up, constantly, poor decisions and mistakes abound.
The whole idea of the scientific method is iteration towards success, if everyone always made the correct decisions there would be no need for iteration.
It's not an excuse for shitty work, science as a whole has a bunch of problems that urgently need addressing, but it is an explanation that allows for more nuance than "scientists stupid, hur hur".
Given your other answers so far I'm not expecting you to actually respond to this in good faith , i'm putting it out there mainly for me.
I can save you some time and say that if this is the calibre of response you normally provide, you should probably just block me, you are almost certainly not going to like interacting with me (or reading anything i write).
That’s a lot of words for a hypocritical “I know you are, but what am I?” Containing its own personal attacks. And coming back at me using an alternate account?
Pathetic. Blocked.
You won't see this because i'm blocked but it went about as i expected.
Predictably boring, nothing of value was lost.