this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
843 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

6812 readers
887 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Citizens Juries" is a phrase often associated with it.

As for PhDs, Experts have tendency to think they know best and move to capture systems. There's an argument to be made that if you want your opinion respected, you should commit to helping without the benefits and corrupting effect of power.

[–] josephmbasile@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Experts do know best in their field of expertise, that's what makes them experts. In such a "Citizen Jury" if we lucked out and got a PhD in microbiology I would probably want that person on the FDA committee or whatever.

Excluding someone from the political process because they have an education is called Kakistocracy.

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

For what it's worth, I have a PhD in Structural Biology, so I'm not exactly an anti-intellectual. In fact, I personally think we should include both felons and PhDs in the selection pool.

That said, I think there are legitimate criticisms of pseudo-intellectual technocrats who use their credentials to push ideology, and I don't think it'd be the worst thing in the world if the people who've already dedicated their life to actually improving the world could sever the (randomly selected) citizens council without having doubt cast upon them via comparison to power-hungry technocrats. If credentials excluded one from direct power, credentials might be seen as a more honest dedication to one's work.

Again, I personally think it's dangerous to exclude anyone from the selection pool. I'm just trying to talk about some of the concerns people might have with the lottery mechanism.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

One of the first thing authoritarians do is eliminate or crush intellectuals. The Soviets murdered all of the Polish intellectuals. The Khmer Rouge did the same thing. Even wearing glasses made you "guilty". They don't want anyone who can talk back.