this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
64 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

11794 readers
343 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It looks like the new target is 5%

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

More like 3% and another 2% is for infrastructure. You only need to pretend that that infrastructure is really badly needed for defense, which is rather easy for a lot of it. Like say those are not metro stations, they are bunkers....

[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Metro stations are defense infrastructure even if they aren't bunkers. Public transit directly achieves Baseline Resilience Requirements 2 & 7. It indirectly achieves others.

NATO'S 7 baseline resilience requirements: https://www.cimic-coe.org/handbook-entries/welcome-to-the-cimic-handbook/vii-resilience/7-2-seven-baseline-requirements/

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of countries have used Subways as bomb shelters I know.

[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They sure do, I'm just trying to demonstrate that public transit infrastructure still matters. Even if it's an above ground system.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

We need a lot more of it. Interstate/interprovince freight and passenger rail, publicly owned. It would pay for itself.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Infrastructure = logistics = defense. Plenty of roads that need building in the north if we wanna be able to maintain a solid presence.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 39 minutes ago)

The expansion of the port of Churchill and land transport links to it could even be considered part of that millitary logistics pipeline (as well as increasing our export capacity).

At one point we had a rocket launching facility there as well

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Northern roads are a tricky thing. Permafrost contains a lot of frost.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

They'll probably have to be gravel and maintained regularly.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some modern subway stations in North America are so ridiculously deep, perhaps we could call them bomb shelters...

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Ukraine has been using subway stations as bunkers for the entire war.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

2% is quite a lot. 5% is madness. I hope that the costs of it start to become apparent to everyone and they reverse course well before they go that far.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

Roadways are defence infrastructure.

Water is defence infrastructure.

Power is defence infrastructure.

Resilient rail is definitely defence infrastructure.

It's very easy to get that other 3% -- and actually get sovereign rail from coast to coast to coast at the same time, which we'd never get if it wasn't a defence project.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do you like speaking russian?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Do you like living in 1956?

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I suspect speaking American is a more proximate threat...

[–] generallynonsensical@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Mine has a huge block of ice on the top.

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, Canada is adjacent to Russian, French and Danish territory as well as American.

But only one is a realistic threat: 2 are allies, one is stuck in a quagmire war that is obliterating their military capability aaaaand one is regularly threatening to invade or annex via a coup.

When fascists tell you who they are and what they plan to do it is usually a good idea to listen. Mango Mussolini loves to compensate for his tiny penis by killing people.

Oh, and it is VERY patronising to assume someone on THIS sub doesnt know the basic geography of Canada and was too stupid to know where Russia is in relation to it. Seriously ?

[–] generallynonsensical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Sure, Canada is adjacent to Russian, French and Danish territory as well as American.

Thanks tips.

But only one is a realistic threat: 2 are allies, one is stuck in a quagmire war that is obliterating their military capability aaaaand one is regularly threatening to invade or annex via a coup.

Nonsense. The TACO Don and his minions know they cannot expect to control a country the size of Canada. You appear to understand the basics so it's curious why you think the US is a greater invasion threat to Canada than Russia. Russia is desperate and arrogant. America is just arrogant.

When fascists tell you who they are and what they plan to do it is usually a good idea to listen. Mango Mussolini loves to compensate for his tiny penis by killing people.

Thanks again Tips. I have many relatives that died in the world wars or were terribly injured. I know what fascism is kid. But Canada isn't Poland and the US isn't Nazi Germany. The US was largely built by Nazi Germany after WW2, sure. But they are nowhere near the intellect of the Germans.

The only way Canada falls to the US is if they get help. And Russia would be the help.

Oh, and it is VERY patronising to assume someone on THIS sub doesnt know the basic geography of Canada and was too stupid to know where Russia is in relation to it. Seriously ?

It was meant to be patronizing. Yes is the answer to your question. I DO NOT think many people in this ~~sub~~ com know the basic geography of Canada. I think this is a reactionary sub where people make statements to spread their own personal fears rather than talk about facts. Personal propaganda if you will.

Have you met people on the internet before? Have you not engaged with the viral stupidity of those who post most often on these platforms? First day?

Honestly, I was going to make an edit to my original comment to say it wasn't meant to be snarky, and I was going to post an image of the "proximity" you mentioned. But I figured it would be a waste of time; like this reply. I believe I was right in that assumption.

Edit: I do love your username. Douglas Adams is the one true god.