this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
832 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

19442 readers
2220 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 80 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

I'm autistic and have an oversized amygdala but that doesn't stop me from being leftist. I just feel compassion for everyone human. Still struggling with the compassion for animals that I eat.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

It's worth buying your meat from places with good practices

I'm fortunate enough to have some permaculture farms nearby

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 4 points 7 hours ago

The best solution to that struggle is to not eat animals

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

ironically i fear the SHIT out of right wingers, because they seem to actively want me to suffer before i die, for the crime of not being able to have a job

[–] SoloPhoenyx@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, they want everyone but themselves personally to suffer and die.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Which is itself a form of suffering, imagine the humanity they miss out on and what you'd be without it. Liberalism and fascism are ideologies that subsist on the concept that there is an imaginary amount of violence that can be inflicted outward to relieve internal suffering.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

There are a lot of “liberals” in the United States who are actually leftists, they’ve just been propagandized their whole lives into believing that’s what liberal is, and that “commies” are right-wing authoritarians. We need to awaken them.

Not all the “libs” are Bill Maher.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

I can't tell if you're joking, or if you actually meant to suggest that liberalism in the US -- the most violent and destructive ideological hegemony in human history -- could be socialism in a trenchcoat because some liberals sleep better with welfare liberal policies as opposed to the more honest and open genocide.

You know socialism was already popular in the US, right? For fifty years before WW2 it gained traction and its advocates successfully clawed away concessional labour rights and social-welfare programs. Y'know what happened? It did improve the conditions for workers in the US; and the institutions of white supremacy and patriarchy effectively disarmed its popularity once privileged classes got theirs. You're claiming to be a communist of some sort, yet have neglected a material analysis of this history. They will reward people who subscribe to liberalism with better material security, and we know it works very well.

Liberals in the US believe what they believe because they correctly identify that so long as this system exists, they will be guaranteed something above any colonized people. They aren't fucking stupid, they don't have to have theoretical language to apply intuitive knowledge on their position in an empire. Liberalism is a result of their position in that society, not some form of victimization that compromises some innate moral purity.

When I say they suffer, it's because of the fundamental ways in which a person who subscribes to that system must sever their connection to humanity and the world to maintain their comfort. It isn't because they're powerless.

[–] notacat@infosec.pub 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Or there is no benefit to introspection. there is no party left of democrats, so it doesn’t change my vote either way.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Learned helplessness.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 3 points 15 hours ago

Its a death cult

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

The fear of dying of starvation should motivate you to contribute in society

spoiler/s

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Veganism is my unattended moral compromise. I am positive that future generations will look at us and our factory farming and, aghast, see us as the monsters as we are - much like we look back at slaveowners, even those who were against the institution at the time.

Since I am not living in or near the wild and not hunting for my own food, it is clear to me that veganism is the only real moral choice, and yet I still participate.

I am complicit in this delightful supreme pizza and complicit in this breaded chicken sandwich.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

I feel your shame friend. We have so little opportunity to do the right thing, and we still fail.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Factory farming is the problem, not animal husbandry. If the whole world went vegan, do you think the vegetables we eat would not be altered to better serve yield rather than quality? Do you think pesticides would not be used in staggering levels? Do you think vegetables aren't alive so it's okay to eat them? If it doesn't have a face, it's cool to eat? Life is sustained by consuming other life, the world over. I agree that industrial farming is disgusting and cruel, but not just to animals.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago

Farming is already optimized for yield.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 10 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Killing animals for taste pleasure is morally wrong, weather it happens in a factory farm or on that mythical uncles farm that tottaly loves and pets his animals to death.

And yes, it's ok to kill plants because they do not feel pain. They can't feel pain because they lack a nervous system to do so as well as an evolutionary reason for pain to exist.

And even if plants feel pain, it takes MUCH more plants to feed animals to then feed humans.

[–] hans@feddit.org 0 points 18 minutes ago

it takes MUCH more plants to feed animals to then feed humans.

most of the plants fed to animals are parts of plants we can't or won't eat. a great example is soy: we run over 4/5 of the global crop through an oil press and extract what we want, and feed the leftover plant matter to animals. no more plants are harmed in this process, and we conserve resources by getting food back from the animals.

[–] hans@feddit.org 0 points 20 minutes ago

And yes, it’s ok to kill plants because they do not feel pain

you can't prove this

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social -5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

what a gish gallop. you sure you didn't have any more righteous claims too stack in?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I was directly adressing the points brought up by the other person. What did you contribute?

[–] hans@feddit.org 0 points 20 minutes ago

Killing animals for taste pleasure is morally wrong

no one does that, anyway. but even if they did, what is wrong with it? eating animals is fine.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Plants don't have nervous systems, which appear to be what enables suffering

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Did you mean to say plants instead of animals, or...?

I'm not even sure about plants not having something similar as a nervous system. They live on different timescale, but it's impressive what e.g. Trees in forests are capable of (with a little help of funghi)

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 3 hours ago

Yep, sure did. Thanks for the correction

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Trust me, the more explorations I do on the nature of consciousness, the more I wrestle with all of that.

I don’t believe that it is inherently wrong to kill in order to eat. But as a species we don’t. Which isn’t to say there aren’t members of our species who very much do still need to kill to eat.

But I don’t need to kill to eat, and I’ve outsourced that killing so it feels like more of an abstraction than it is. I can at the very least acknowledge this.

Which I think is almost worse... think about concentration/extermination camps (which I think our animal industry is basically)

And it's perfectly healthy to be vegan (maybe even more healthy at this point when done right, than meat consumption).

My main reason though for that is less moral than just wanting to be less wasteful, i.e. meat is just inefficient. I predict that we at some point will move past meat consumption, it's just not necessary, even when considering taste...

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

I feel bad for the forks and spoons in the drawer which didn't get used that day... My amygdala must be an absolute fuckin' HOG

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

that doesn't stop me from being leftist

It's because you're autistic!