this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
879 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

19442 readers
2145 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Factory farming is the problem, not animal husbandry. If the whole world went vegan, do you think the vegetables we eat would not be altered to better serve yield rather than quality? Do you think pesticides would not be used in staggering levels? Do you think vegetables aren't alive so it's okay to eat them? If it doesn't have a face, it's cool to eat? Life is sustained by consuming other life, the world over. I agree that industrial farming is disgusting and cruel, but not just to animals.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

Farming is already optimized for yield.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 9 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Killing animals for taste pleasure is morally wrong, weather it happens in a factory farm or on that mythical uncles farm that tottaly loves and pets his animals to death.

And yes, it's ok to kill plants because they do not feel pain. They can't feel pain because they lack a nervous system to do so as well as an evolutionary reason for pain to exist.

And even if plants feel pain, it takes MUCH more plants to feed animals to then feed humans.

[–] hans@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

it takes MUCH more plants to feed animals to then feed humans.

most of the plants fed to animals are parts of plants we can't or won't eat. a great example is soy: we run over 4/5 of the global crop through an oil press and extract what we want, and feed the leftover plant matter to animals. no more plants are harmed in this process, and we conserve resources by getting food back from the animals.

[–] hans@feddit.org 0 points 2 hours ago

And yes, it’s ok to kill plants because they do not feel pain

you can't prove this

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social -5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

what a gish gallop. you sure you didn't have any more righteous claims too stack in?

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I was directly adressing the points brought up by the other person. What did you contribute?

[–] hans@feddit.org 0 points 2 hours ago

Killing animals for taste pleasure is morally wrong

no one does that, anyway. but even if they did, what is wrong with it? eating animals is fine.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Plants don't have nervous systems, which appear to be what enables suffering

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Did you mean to say plants instead of animals, or...?

I'm not even sure about plants not having something similar as a nervous system. They live on different timescale, but it's impressive what e.g. Trees in forests are capable of (with a little help of funghi)

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 5 hours ago

Yep, sure did. Thanks for the correction

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Trust me, the more explorations I do on the nature of consciousness, the more I wrestle with all of that.

I don’t believe that it is inherently wrong to kill in order to eat. But as a species we don’t. Which isn’t to say there aren’t members of our species who very much do still need to kill to eat.

But I don’t need to kill to eat, and I’ve outsourced that killing so it feels like more of an abstraction than it is. I can at the very least acknowledge this.

Which I think is almost worse... think about concentration/extermination camps (which I think our animal industry is basically)

And it's perfectly healthy to be vegan (maybe even more healthy at this point when done right, than meat consumption).

My main reason though for that is less moral than just wanting to be less wasteful, i.e. meat is just inefficient. I predict that we at some point will move past meat consumption, it's just not necessary, even when considering taste...