riskable

joined 2 years ago
[–] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just use KDE and you get klipper which is an amazing clipboard manager. It keeps track of everything you've copied to your clipboard (raise the history to 999).

Configure it to pop up at the cursor location and whenever you type the keystroke you'll have access to everything.

I personally prefer that it not paste immediately upon selection but there's a number of options like that to set it up to your liking.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 29 points 8 months ago

This guy does berry good work.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 18 points 8 months ago

This assumes the people in the Trump administration are capable of feeling embarrassment or shame.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Llamer or illmer

Just like the "lamer" term from the 80s and 90s:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamer

It basically boils down to: Someone who has no idea what they're doing. Someone who is willfully ignorant of how things work or are meant to be used.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 24 points 8 months ago

"Pretending to be a young girl in order to commit fraud against your own child brings dishonor to your family."

"Alcoholism brings dishonor to your family."

"Narcissism brings dishonor to your family."

"Put a family picture on your next bottle of alcohol to remind you why you're alone."

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

From a copyright perspective, you don't need to ask for permission to train an AI. It's no different than taking a bunch of books you bought second-hand and throwing them into a blender. Since you're not distributing anything when you do that you're not violating anyone's copyright.

When the AI produces something though, that's when it can run afoul of copyright. But only if it matches an existing copyrighted work close enough that a judge would say it's a derivative work.

You can't copyright a style (writing, art, etc) but you can violate a copyright if you copy say, a mouse in the style of Mickey Mouse. So then the question—from a legal perspective—becomes: Do we treat AI like a Xerox copier or do we treat it like an artist?

If we treat it like an artist the company that owns the AI will be responsible for copyright infringement whenever someone makes a derivative work by way of a prompt.

If we treat it like a copier the person that wrote the prompt would be responsible (if they then distribute whatever was generated).

[–] riskable@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But that's no fun at all!

Most people want a system that lets them dress politicians in lame, opposite-sex, revealing clothing. Why else would such a system exist? Nobody cares what they (themselves) would look like in such clothes!

I'm sure in the 2.0 version there will be a "chest" slider—due to popular demand!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

More interesting superpowers. I want stuff like the powers in Sagrada Reset. Not stereotypical stuff like strength, speed, invisibility, etc.

I also want to see a shapeshifter character as one of the good guys! Why are they always the bad guys?

Give people some superpowers with interesting limitations and make them work together in clever ways to accomplish amazing feats that would never be possible on their own.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The reason why that didn't work is because you need two sticks of RAM. The phrase is, "pairs well."

[–] riskable@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"I wonder what would happen if I just..."

[–] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's bananas!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago

So... You were lovin' it and they were having it their way.

view more: ‹ prev next ›