Your point about the ozone layer response is very relevant to our expectations of solving climate change. I think replacing CFCs was just low hanging fruit, which I didn't understand as a kid. I just assumed if we kept recycling and not consuming so much it would put us on track. So naive.
goodthanks
For sure, I think the patriot act was a turning point in trust of government in the US. It filtered though to our government in Australia during the Howard years. Similar to the US, around the GFC we had a hopeful change of government, but that hope for progressive values (Obama for you guys, Rudd for us) turned out to be misguided. I tend to think of those "centre left" governments as representing managed societal decline as opposed to the accelerated decline of the right wing parties.
And every hair on your back, shoulders and ass is step towards being Chuck Norris.
I think part of the problem is disillusion. Millenials in the west grew up in a period where it looked like tech was going to benefit society, and climate change was going to be addressed, and ethical consumerism was somewhat meaningful, and social mobility would still exist. We are having to downgrade our expectations and it hurts.
There's an interesting psychological analysis about musk on a podcast called Psychology in Seattle. They speculate that he is unconconsiously recreating his childhood bullying on twitter due to a psychological phenomenum called "repetition compulsion". As in, you recreate relationships from childhood to try to have a " corrective experience" to heal the trauma.
Win the expectation to do more work without proper compensation, in my experience.
I'm surprised (or maybe not that much) that there's no mention of the historical context of the 1936 revolutionary war, which was partly driven by inequality. How much land must fall into the hands of the wealthy few until we see something like that again.
Difficult topic to discuss in a sensitive and respectful manner.
"He's among a group of psychiatrists who argue the gender-affirming treatment model discounts underlying psychiatric issues in youths who present with gender dysphoria."
Reasonable statement that deserves some discussion.
"There is NO reliable evidence that trans identification can be differentiated from psychosis," he wrote on X last year.
And immediately this individual's credibility is tainted by a hyperbolic and disrespectful statement. I wish the ABC wouldn't do that.
There are a small number of people who detransition due to misdiagnosis, which should lead to a discussion about lack of access to high quality psychologists when you're trying to figure out what you need to do to feel OK.
I think sexual insecurity plays a role. The trans hate is repackaged homophobia. Gay panic used to be a legal defence for example https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_panic_defense
Affordable housing is a bullshit term. It should be defined based on income, whether that's wages or welfare. Secure housing for everyone should be a no brainer in this country.
I get that. I just felt the need to defend lilly a bit because I've been reading his books since I was a teenager. It's like when you read something inaccurate about a topic you know. Just wanting to correct the record somewhat.
The major leap is the devaluing of human work, but instead of coming after material craftsmanship, like shoe making and cabinet making etc., it's coming after abstract thinking. Copy writers are fucked for example. We will accept the inferior product because we have no choice. And yet we have to fight for a job to exist as those jobs becomes scarcer. I think if David Graeber was still around he would have a bullshit jobs 2.0 book out expanding on this.