Swedneck

eh is that really true though? in my experience our brains tend to go "wow, this looks exactly right but there's something ineffably off about it and i hate it!"

that's literally how it works though, the software is trained to remove noise from images and then you feed it pure noise and tell it there's an image behind it. If that's not hallucination idk what would be.

that removes the reference to how it actually functions though, at that point you might as well just stop being coy and call it "AI dogshit"

surely how popular someone is has no bearing on how much money they can get from a defamation lawsuit? The deciding factor should be how much harm they've been caused.

i mean i'm all for shitting on people who think AI should replace humans, but surely it only hurts the message to call AI content ugly when it looks completely nondescript? At least to me it comes across as a bit dogmatic.

i always like to call it hallucination, it's significantly closer to how it works both technically and in effect.

yyyyyyoink

this is just like, 96% of organizations

as if most products don't list country of origin already anyways..

N'wah!

oh fuck this isn't the necronomicon, it's the oghma infinium

this is left as an exercise for the reader

my dude schizoposting hard