this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
691 points (97.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45467 readers
700 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 187 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is this the most efficient way to store 17 houses?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

So much more room for delicious maple syrup.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 136 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It’s called being optimal sweaty.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Sweety.

Optional sweaty is the perfect amount of perspiration to have upon one's person.

[–] night_petal@piefed.social 20 points 3 days ago

The misuse of the word is intentional and part of the joke. An artifact from reddit.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

*Optimal

Optional sweater is when you choose to perspire

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago

*sweaty

Optional Sweater is when you have the exact correct sweater for the occasion

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Someone followed true north, and someone followed magnetic?

[–] MuteDog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Someone followed north and someone followed the coast line. This is in Jacksonville Beach, FL

[–] Logical@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Idk why, but this is oddly satisfying to me.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 84 points 3 days ago

Reminds me of this place:

(I remember just walking to school and it felt weird walking on a "slanted" street lol)

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How about a grid system that changes direction at every single avenue?

Still a better system than Boston, having navigated both MANY times. To call Boston's streets a "system" is an insult to the very concept of order.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

Speaking as someone who has been living in towns with rivers for most of my life:

This is the way.

My experience clearly says that you will loose orientation and get confused the moment you go to a district that is not alligned with the riverbank.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Looks like everyone started a new road perpendicular to the shore line, and the mess occurred when the roads got long enough to meet.

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

No they're were designed that way. The names remain the same no matter how many times they turn. The street i live on starts off going west, then south, then south west and back to west again on the other side of town.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago

Bingo. Allow me to introduce you to the colonial French seigneurial system.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 days ago

Lol get fucking rotated

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 65 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 99 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is the part in Sim City where I restart.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 38 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Aw, now I miss Sim City 2000

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 23 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Sim City 4 is the best version of the Sim City games, and is 75% off on GOG right now, $5 / £4.

Cities Skylines 1 is the best modern city builder, 3D and a lot of fun plus well designed. But only really worth it when it's on sale; lots of DLC and overpriced as a package when not on sale. Avoid Cities Skylines 2 - it's just not fun and hasn't been fixed - maybe they will one day fix but I doubt it 2.5 years in..

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine what Cities Skylines could have been without Paradox's super monetization plan

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At least with places like Denver and other western cities it's pretty straightforward how it happened - everything built along the river. Access to the river was key.

Being a boom/bust city means that a much later boom they adjusted.

Then even older cities (think Boston) grew before any opportunity at planning could happen.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Denver was two cities - Auraria (correction from Aurora thanks to @negativenull) and Denver. One was built to align with the river, the other with compass points and then they grew big enough to smush into each other and neither was willing to concede to the other.

Also Denver’s namesake, a Kansas politician, never even visited. It was a failed attempt to lure him here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

There has to be some interesting history here.

A few other examples have been posted, but this is easily the wildest. It's not even the same aspect ratio of grid, or at a normal angle to the rest, or over a very significant area. (And they've still managed to tie it in reasonably well)

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think that area was built when nothing else was there, without the developer thinking too hard about its orientation.

As time went on, new development started nearby, oriented to a different geographic element, like a shoreline, or a river, etc. eventually that development met the old development, and they were lined up differently, and the municipality stuck with the new grid system orientation and just built around the old one.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's tough to look at, but I bet it's amazing for traffic calming.

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 9 points 3 days ago

Came here to say the same. This design (or accident) forces north/south traffic to use the arterials on either side of the neighbourhood instead of going through the neighbourhood.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 51 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Where is this?

Edit: Found it! Jacksonville Beach, FL

30.280765 N 81.393002 W

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was thinking maybe an old Spanish Land Grant or something maybe. But, that doesn't seem to be the case. That block is orientated north, while the surrounding blocks are oriented parallel with the coast, just east (right) of the crop. So then, I thought that maybe it was one weird plat of lot and the city grew around it. Nope. The thing is, you can look up all the plats (thanks to Florida's sunshine laws) back to the original bureau of land management surveys (thanks to the BLM & labins.org).There aren't even that many. This neighborhood has been like this from it's beginning as far as I can tell. Around 1911 the whole town, then called Pablo Beach, was platted. And right there in the middle is this weird block, seemingly by design and without explanation. It was replatted in 1922, keeping the twisted block intact. It's been residential neighborhood and largely unchanged since then (at least as far as the parcels and streets are concerned).

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In my experience, many cities old enough in the US. Almost every biggish city where I live has the center of town laying differently than the newer, surrounding areas. There was a time when they oriented things different than how they plan it out now so now the older downtown areas look cock-eyed on a map/satellite image.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] becausechemistry@piefed.social 42 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Indianapolis built the central mile square of streets aligned with magnetic north, but then the rest of downtown aligned with true north. It’s almost aligned, which causes problems at that border.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 43 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Here's another one:

Missoula, MT

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] anugeshtu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's a Moiré!

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago

I kinda like it. It's just neat enough.

A lot of old city plats follow the exact pattern of that square, so I'd be curious what the sequence of development was.

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 29 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Ugh that grid pattern. Imagine living somewhere so uninspired.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Have you considered maybe it’s easier to navigate and plan a grid pattern? I wouldn’t mind uninspired street names like 1st, 2nd, 3rd St, crossways with N, O, P, Q Ave so you at least know which direction is which. Give me that chess board layout so I don’t need to pull up a map to navigate your city please. Car C1 takes Bar G5

[–] baines@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and then 14th SE doesnt connect with 14th NE

thanks portland

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago (6 children)

My city has a street that changes name 4 times as you go down it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Sure but you'll never encounter the magic of a crooked alley snaking its way through a maze of medieval building.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

They probably did it so they could squeeze one more house in when building the track.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Unrelated but, Theres a section of Prince George Canada that all of a sudden does a big U. The story i was told is that back in the day there were two competing railway companies, and one of them bought enough influence that when the city was making roads to the other company, they instead made the roads bend back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

If anything a perfect grid would be mildly infuriating, it's more interesting this way

load more comments
view more: next ›