The article doesn't spell out the broader context for laymen like me. Can anyone clarify some points. Are these images taken from biopsies of tissues that are already suspected of being cancerous? Is this work translatable to preventative screening in a way that I'm unfamiliar with, or is it limited to processing biopsies?
For automated tools like this, what sort of protocols are established to prevent doctors from being biased by the tool output? Does the person running the test provide their findings before they see the output of software detection?
The extra air is to keep the chips from getting crushed and breaking in transport, and other lies we tell ourselves to not feel the crushing weight of being ripped off at every turn.