While I love this idea, I'm concerned lobbyists would somehow figure out a way to get the Government to consider ads a service to internet users putting the tax burden on us. Imagine getting an ad followed by an email with a GST bill submitted to you and the CRA.
Cephalotrocity
I wonder when it will start raining stockbrokers.
What's that expression?
'Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me 50,000 times I become a rabid terrorist supporting gullible rube'.
Lol, I mean, the link you provided... to wikipedia... says they've been 'accused' of being right-wing or non-partisan so I guess take your pick who to believe? Their mission statement seems pretty respectable to me.
Gotta take care of that shit too
This is why Freedom of Speech is such an important right. Lets everyone know who the problem is.
A house is always worth a house.
It was this tautology I took issue with. I do agree that there are many housing related ways to invest that are far less susceptible to market manipulation.
Except when the bubble bursts, or the market turns.
Buying a house now just before an election, where the subsequent Government will almost certainly take drastic steps to alleviate the housing crisis, is begging to lose significant value to depreciation.
Buy a house to have a home? Absolutely. Buying one solely as an investment? I'd wait a year to see how the dust settles first.
If you were really curious you might have bothered to read the actual article. You would then know that the HJS is only one commenter in a list that also includes the Telegraph, and Honest Reporting within it. All of which are rated as right-leaning biased, but at least HonestReporting gets a "mostly-factual" from MBFC. The published data being criticized is from Hamas (and always has been).
The bias is good to be aware of, but the factuality is critical. Considering a left-biased Euronews published the same report I suspect there is some truth to the core facts being discussed.
No, it's a question.
In ancient Greece and Rome pederasty was a thing, so no.