this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
250 points (98.4% liked)

News

36512 readers
2112 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A health-care executive has slapped Last Week Tonight host John Oliver with a lawsuit, alleging the comedian-turned-talk-show-host defamed him in a 2024 episode by twisting his words and making “false accusations.”

The episode in question, which aired in April of last year, linked Dr. Brian Morley, a hospital administrator and former medical director for AmeriHealth Caritas in Iowa, to a drastic decrease in Medicaid services and accused him of thinking “it’s OK if people have s–t on them for days.”

The complaint, filed late last week in the New York Southern District Court, claims that Oliver and his team “entirely snipped out of context and manipulated two sentences of Morley’s testimony” during an administrative proceeding so that they could “accomplish their defamation,” reports Entertainment Weekly.

(For those interested here is the episode. Dr. Morley speaks at 21:22.)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bVIsnOfNfCo

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 118 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Last Week Tonight has lawyers who vet what John says. Guaranteed there's nothing wrong with that episode.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

SLAPP suits aren't about wrong or right. They are about intimidation only. And John is going to kick their ass and make them look like fools in the process

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Can all but guarantee that he'll be doing an episode about this lawsuit, only serving to increase visibility on how much of a p.o.s. the original target IS.

Streisand effect FTW.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 90 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You sue Last Week Tonight when the Streisand Effect just isn't enough.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 11 months ago

You have officially made my saved comment list.

You ______ when the Streisand Effect just isn't enough.

will now be forever engrained in my lexicon.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The exec is about to discover the Streisand effect.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Perhaps even the Streisand-Mangioni effect

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

One can only hope

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 57 points 11 months ago (1 children)

if you enjoyed the Fuck You Bob segment, wait til you see Fuck You Brian.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Ooooh, a new song!

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 56 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He's fallen for one of the classic blunders! The most famous of which is, "never get involved in a land war in Asia," but only slightly less well known is this: never go up against John Oliver in a defamation suit!

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 49 points 11 months ago

Yes, yes. Sue the guy who's got a multinational television show, entire production team and legal support to legally shit all over people doing horrible things

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Manipulated 2 sentences," as in, they played a recording of him saying what he said.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

To be fair that can be out of context. I remember a Daily Show segment years ago showing a fox news clip of Obama saying something questionable. It was like only a sentence or two. Stewart, playing up how bad it sounded, asked to the ether if there was some context that could make that ok. The full statement, which fox cut out, was prefaced with the phrase "Now I'm not saying..."

[–] Typhoonigator@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I remember that. I tried searching for the clip, but of course all the old Daily Show clips aren't available any more. I found a couple of articles (one even with embedded video that no longer works), but here's the wikipedia article on this specific event.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Yeah…no pun intended, but I’m going to need more context on that.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is also what caused Bush’s infamous “fool me once, shame on–… Shame on you… You fool me– Can’t get fooled again…” clip. He realized halfway into the first sentence that he was about to hand democrats a crystal clear “shame on me” sound bite to use in all of their campaigns. So he did a hard pivot and avoided finishing the phrase. He got dragged for botching the phrase, but that just played into the “Bush is so dumb” stereotype that already existed.

[–] jaredt@lemmy.ca 21 points 11 months ago

I knew health-care execs were evil pieces of pus-filled human garbage but I never could have imagined someone saying anything like that in a testimony, regardless of context. Maybe I’m naïve

[–] Ethalis@jlai.lu 21 points 11 months ago

I can't see any context where those two sentences wouldn't be awful

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 8 points 11 months ago