Azzu

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] Azzu@leminal.space 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, maybe, but if I look at the picture, I can see that the topmost mattresses are perfectly even, i.e. the bendy part of the negative comment is completely evened out after the 4th "positive comment mattress", i.e. you can't feel it at all anymore above that.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Kann ich dir alles nicht sagen, ich bin nicht der, der das originale Argument gebracht hat. Ich bin nur hier als Dolmetscher.

Aber ich kann mir zum Beispiel Situationen vorstellen, wo ja man queer lebt, z.b. poly und das Gesetz es nicht erlaubt mehr als einen zu heiraten/einzutragen. Oder wo die Eltern Flüchtlinge sind und keine Rente oder ähnliches bekommen. Aber ja, nur Spekulationen, kA.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 2 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Wait, I don't get it. So do you mean to say that you get so many positive comments, that the slight negative ones are completely irrelevant as once you're insulated with so many layers of positive ones, you can't even tell there's negative ones in there somewhere?

If that is what you mean, then yes actually. I'm so lucky to be getting so much love from around me, that I don't even notice the negative ones anymore.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

Was die Person gemeint hat und du nicht verstanden hast, ist dass es Situationen gibt, die ähnliche Belastungen wie "Kinder haben" erfordern, aber als "kinderlos" gewertet werden.

Zum Beispiel wenn du ein Partner von einem alleinerziehenden Elternteil bist, dann kann es sein, dass du als kinderlos gewertet wirst, auch wenn du ein Kind unterstützt. Bist halt nicht als Erziehungsberechtigter eingetragen oder whatever.

Oder du musst Eltern pflegen, was ähnlich wie Kinder pflegen ist von den Kosten her, aber du wirst als "kinderlos" gezählt. Usw usw

Im Endeffekt wird bezweifelt, dass ausschließlich Leute, die "mehr für sich selbst haben" getroffen werden damit. "Kinderlos" muss nicht unbedingt bedeuten "hat mehr für sich selbst".

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Well yeah, you don't like it. That's ok. But your experience is not the only valid one in the world.

What do you mean "how else?" - I can come up with several different ways without even really thinking about it.

What do you mean, "it's the best way"? - best for what or whom? Best for you maybe. But not necessarily for others.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Is this a purely online friend group? Or also offline one?

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean I assume you don't have much sex or a girlfriend or anything.

In that case, at least from what I know from myself or my friends, this desire to look is completely normal. I think you might follow that desire a little bit too much (as it is something you can control), but the base feeling you have is something most men experience.

Your nature is telling you to approach women and have sex with them. For some reason, you don't, maybe because you're scared, socially anxious, people have told you being sexual is terrible, whatever. This part of your nature is very strong, and as it seems the only thing left for you is looking, of course you're going to want to do it.

If you actually approach women and have a healthy sex life, that desire probably goes down, but of course now you've also made it a kind of compulsive habit, so it might be hard to break.

It's honestly quite ridiculous to me that you're ashamed of looking at sexually attractive people. Despite what some radical feminists or whoever will tell you, just looking and being sexually attracted is nothing shameful. It's more likely that this shame itself is causing the issue, since you're sexual, yet that is for some reason shameful so you can't satisfy it, causing you to have more of a sexual desire since you have so little of actual action.

Sexuality is our main drive, it is constant, and there's nothing wrong with it as long as you inquire about people's boundaries and respect them.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's almost like it encourages crazy sneaky infiltrations that would otherwise be impossible. It's almost as if it enables unbelievably fun missions. It's almost as if it makes the players feel like heroes with superhuman abilities.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Danke, ich habe damit einen Drachen bekämpft:

          ,  ,
          \\ \\
          ) \\ \\    _p_
          )^\))\))  /  *\
           \_|| || / /^`-'
  __       -\ \\--/ /
<'  \\___/   ___. )'
     `====\ )___/\\          \  q
          //     `"           \-|-D
          \\    /  \           / \
[–] Azzu@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I challenge you to name a country where military veterans are not, in the broadest sense, at least viewed positively by the general public.

The level of it is different, but I don't know any country where the majority views their veterans unfavourably.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago

And like religion, it's necessary for their minds because the truth would make them break.

view more: next ›