It's one thing for states like FL, TX, and WA to do this, since they have tourism, oil, and/or high sales tax to make up for it. But Mississippi doesn't have anything going for it except for an efficient use of the alphabet in its name. This will absolutely cause the state to crumble even more and become more of a welfare state.
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
94 points (99.0% liked)
News
28316 readers
3678 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
When the rich technically make no income then regular working Americans end up paying more income tax than billionaires
Income tax disproportionately effects the poor unfortunately
No. Not really. That depends on the tax rates, my friend.
It sounds like it only goes to 0 if certain goals are met, otherwise it'll go down to, and then stay at 3%.
So if they can't figure something out like those other states, it won't go to 0.
Still a bad idea, but it's not a lets make it 0% right away then FAFO
Just a further thought...
It'd be interesting if the tax could automatically increase if these goals that were met, were no longer met.
So to go from 3% to 2% you need to generate an extra billion revenue, but if you lose that revenue it then climbs back to 3%.
It would really complicate the system... you'd essentially need to always be set up to charge income tax, but then have a variable rate that updates the systems maybe quarterly or yearly. But you couldn't ditch the system entirely since you'd need companies to have a method to suddenly start charging it again if it had to go from 0% to 0.5%
It would really complicate the system...
I bet you could pitch it to TurboTax
Shit, I should delete my comment before they get any ideas.
As intended
I work remotely, so I can do my job from anywhere. Cost of living is cheap in Mississippi, and I would save considerably even factoring in the cost for private school for my kids.
I still would never move to Mississippi.
I also work remotely.
But I'm brown.
Nope, you live in a society.
Try working at home with unreliable power or water.
Try driving many tens of minutes to the nearest store on crumbling roads.
Retail employees and utility service employees will decline in their education.
Many people will lose their homes and live on the streets. You might have to move to a gated community, and pay for private police patrols.
There will be more fires as people live in the woods and need to cook or stay warm.
Doctors will leave the state when patients can't pay, so hope you don't get sick. You'll have to live close to a way to get out of state for medical care.
Private school will become scarce and more expensive as teachers leave the state.
“Cheap place to live” is just another way of saying “I figured out how to pass my costs on to others.”
Good point!
All additional valid reasons not to live there.
My husband interviewed in Mississippi about 30 years ago and they set him up with a realtor to show him around. When he asked about schools she told him his kids wouldn't go to public school and said the two choices were military school or church school. He saw a big black building across the railroad tracks and asked about it. She said, "that's black wal-mart." We did not move there!
eliminating revenue used for funding critical infrastructure will SURELY make mississippi look more attractive..
Big federal welfare state becoming a bigger federal welfare state. Congratulations on your self promotion!
"""typos"""