42, obviously
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
26 points (82.5% liked)
Asklemmy
47122 readers
1534 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I've also wondered about this too. In my opinion, at least several layers, but not more than 25. No good reason, it just feels right to me.
Odds are we are one of the many layers and not the top.
Infant its infinite to one odds
The fact that light speed is actually the speed of causality is pretty compelling evidence that our universe is a simulation and thatβs the clock speed of the CPU or the set simulation speedβ¦
That being said, I think itβs more fucked than that. The simulation could be more recursive and fractal. Like, some universe can be a projection of another universe thatβs projected by another universe, but somehow you land back to itself.
If we do the analogy with CPU, then plank time is CPU clock, and plank length the discretisation of field, a bit like floating point precision. At each clock, causality influence the cell next to her.
But in this case, why the universe so huge and why speed of light so slow ?
I mean, speed of light is fucking slow compared to universe, but quite instantaneous at our scale. It seems like the simulation has been designed to work well at our scale. So, are we the subject of the simulation, or an unexpected side effect ?
Im in the camp that god is an nth dimensional programmer and we are the expirament.
I like the fractal idea. In the end it's just a question of taste imo
I disagree with your corollary. We don't know the rules of the universe that our simulated universe resides in. We could be the first layer or an infinitely lower layer, and there would be no way of knowing.
Agree, we don't know the rule of layer above ours. It has been demonstrated that Mathematics are the same at any point of our universe, but I'm not aware of anything outside of universe. And I doubt this could be even demonstrable.
At least, we are sure that, starting from ou layer, there is a finite number of possible layer below.
If you are assuming we live in a simulation, then you have to assume everything else about it too - there is no evidence to point in any direction about anything higher than our own layer, so ours is the only one we can do science on. All else would be imagination, so make up whatever you like.
I do agree though that a simulator can't fully simulate itself, so yeah, it would have to be bigger and more complex in at least some way, which could simply be runtime.
I don't know, Timmy, being God is a big responsibility
Holy fucking shit ! I just fall into this rabbit hole, I was suppose to mow the lawn and go to the dump this morning, my wife will kill me π
When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
The Loosh Farm.
Definitely layer 7.