Protesting takes lots of forms, including what happened here. This was of course a protest. But this is important context that was left out of the headline, as headlines often do for obvious reasons.
cattywampas
Not strictly for protesting though. For disrupting a Microsoft event.
Especially season 1 Picard.
My head canon comes from the Steve Shives video about holodecks.
As holodecks use a combination of hologram and replicator technology you can suppose that when they were first installed on the Enterprise they would fully replicate simple objects that people were likely to interact with, such as the snowball Wesley threw or the piece of paper Data carries off. When Picard got hit in the face with a snowball, maybe he told engineering "hey this is unsafe and inappropriate for the flagship of Starfleet, can we get that changed?" Since it was a fairly low-level ticket or maybe because it was a tough fix, it took them a while to get it implemented. So for a while you may see the odd object carried off the holodeck, but by the time of "Ship in a Bottle" that issue has long been solved and nothing can be taken off the holodeck.
This is all going to depend on what exactly the lease says as well as local laws. OP needs to talk to a lawyer.
You should definitely talk to a lawyer, as this is going to depend on your local laws and ordinances.
ENT is underrated. Yeah a little rough at times, but which series isn't. Every day I'm angry that we didn't get more seasons and get to watch the birth of the Federation.
Also, while TOS has a special place in my heart and in Trek fandom, it has not aged well for many reasons.
Not a single fact, but reading about science and history makes me feel better about the state of the world whenever I'm feeling anxious.
Oh my bad, I misread it
Applesauce and white bread. Potato chips and ketchup.
Much as I love these two, I don't know if he'd make a great Scotty.
I pretty much just ignore the series finale of ENT