this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
825 points (99.5% liked)

News

37381 readers
2048 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump cut funding to Yale’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which was tracking Russian war crimes, including the abduction of 35,000 Ukrainian children.

A Yale source claims the U.S. State Department deleted key evidence, possibly hindering prosecution efforts and rescue missions. The data was crucial to the ICC’s case against Putin and others.

Trump, who recently met with Putin, has taken a pro-Russian stance.

Yale’s project had led to multiple indictments, but its shutdown raises concerns over legal and humanitarian consequences.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rimu@piefed.social 96 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Remember when all the cookers were going on about "Save the children"?

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

It’s never about the children.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Remember when all the liars pretended to care about Palestinian children and yet somehow voted for Jill Stein or stayed at home? I do.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 60 to 0 is so abrupt in the noise they made, I'm starting to wonder how significant a portion of that cohort was just bots and troll farms

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I think many of them were not people with real opinions. Because that opinion was idiotic. Ignoring the consequences one claims to be avoiding takes a special kind of stupid

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think they were real people because I regularly get into arguments with those dumbasses. They also always have the same bullshit easily proven wrong logic.

Fuck, two people today told me "Not voting isn't inaction." Like how fucking stupid do you have to be to think literally not doing anything is going to make something happen?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you honestly believe there's no message when people refuse to participate in a system they've lost faith in?

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's a message, but by refusing to participate you are unable to enact change. It's literally inaction. You've done nothing. In fact, they want you to do nothing. They do so much to pass voter suppression though loopholes and here you are, just handing it to them.

Congratulations, you suppressed yourself.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I voted. But just to piss you off I won't next time. I don't want anything to do with a system that makes people this self righteous.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"I'm not doing anything, that'll show them."

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Please. My state is going to go blue every single time. Voting here is about as productive as masturbating and a lot less fun.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the article ...

A Yale source said the US state department deleted the evidence which would have been used as part of rescue efforts to get the children home to Ukraine. It would also have been used to prosecute those behind their abductions – including Russian president Vladimir Putin.

”It is unclear whether it was by accident or intent, but it may reveal or it may cause potential criminal liability for the Trump administration, given international prohibitions against the destruction of war crimes evidence,” the Yale insider told The Independent.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is unclear whether it was by accident or intent

Lmao. It's as clear as a pane of glass...

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 10 points 1 year ago

Ooh, nifty wanton destruction of war crimes evidence sounds like a charge that has legs.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Fascists of a feather fuck up the world together.

[–] suddenlyme@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Throw it on the pile.

[–] el_twitto@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It looks like Trump has moved from Russian asset to Russian agent.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

🌎👩‍🚀🔫👩‍🚀

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To the governor of a Russian Oblast.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Oh, come on! Let's be generous and call it an autonomous republic.

[–] Lootboblin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

always has been

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Boom. Something this heinous certainly will cause a drop in egg prices.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I can already smell the omelets. All it took was war crimes.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does cutting funding end up deleting data? Unless they where hosting this stuff on fed systems they shouldn't have been able to touch it, much less delete it.

As for the 'maybe it was accidental', I'd laugh if it wasn't so painful to reiterate what kind of sociopath we have running things.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How does cutting funding end up deleting data?

Per the article, they were explicit deletions.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How could there only be one copy of it in the first place?

[–] sep@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This! Do they not have backups?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yes puppet, Yes puppet, He’s a puppet.