this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
15 points (94.1% liked)

Perth / Western Australia

564 readers
10 users here now

Below are some resources for Perth/Western Australian info that could help find the perfect story for that exceptional post.

Suggestions to add to the list are very welcome!

This community wishes to be about all things Perth/WA, not just latest news. Whether its memes, dreams, or custard creams! Tell us your Western Australian story! ๐Ÿฆ˜

Local News/Lifestyle
The Urban List

Xpress mag

Perth Voice

Margaret River Wine

Post Newspapers

Perth Is OK

Fremantle Shipping News

Belltower Times (satire)

Echo Newspaper

particle.scitech

watoday

Margaret River Mail

Fremantle Herald

Business News (subscriber)

University, TAFE and Related
Notre Dame

North Metro Tafe

South Metro Tafe

ECU

UWA

Scitech

Murdoch

Curtin

Pelican Magazine

Western Indepent

Miscellaneous
Brendan's Odyssey

Jesse Noakes

Freoview

Conversation, Flavio Macau

Conversation, Hannah Mcglade

Government/LGA
WA.Gov, announcements

Department of Biodiversity, Conservation, and Attractions

City of Vincent

City of Stirling

Commerce.wa

State Library of WA

City of Perth

Boola Bardip Museum

Inherit.dplh

Emergencey.wa

WA Podcasts
Wild WA Podcast

Business News Podcasts

Particle.Scitech Podcasts

Occasional WA Focus
Renew Economy

Rail Express

Stockhead

The Guardian AU

The Conversation

Oz Native Plants

ABC WA
ABC WA

ABC Perth

ABC Esperance

ABC Goldfields

ABC Great Southern

ABC Kimberley

ABC Wheatbelt

ABC Pilbara

ABC Southwest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I haven't seen much reporting on this.

No one is surprised Labor have the Assembly, but that's all the media seem to be reporting on.

https://www.elections.wa.gov.au/elections/state/sgelection#/sg2025

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, this is really the second major story of the election. And the proof is in the vote difference between the Nationals and Greens.

The Greens have about twice the number of votes as the Nationals, and have for a while, but have until now been less represented due what amounted to a rural/pastoral gerrymander.

Its really good to see the Upper House start resembling the shares of votes these Partys recieve, whoever they are.

Labor, for their reasons as well, did the right thing here.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm tired so please correct any mistakes.

If we just take the current count as-is (55% counted, 34 seats decided, 3 in doubt):

  • labor = 15
  • lib+nat = 10+2 = 12
  • greens = 4
  • one nation = 1
  • aus christians = 1
  • legalise cannabis = 1

19 votes is a majority.

  • If Labor get all three remaining, they end up with 18 and need any one extra vote to give them a majority.

  • But if Labor only get two and the other goes to Lib/Nat, only Lib, Nat or the Greens can give them a majority

  • If Lib+Nat get all three remaining, and if we assume for the sake of example that they always have one nation and aus christians, they still only have 17 and need either Green or Labor for a majority. Greens can also still give Labor a majority in this situation.

  • If, somehow, one nation, christians or cannabis get all three, they can give Labor a majority without Greens' help, but can't give Lib+Nats a majority without Greens.

The bottom line is, in any situation from here, Labor cannot form majority alone, and Labor+Greens will always form majority. However, if Labor are lucky, they could instead form a majority with Legalise Cannabis Australia, or another minor party, rather than Greens. And, obviously, Labor and Liberals can always form a majority on issues they agree on.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know that society faces some big problems but I'm happy to see the legalise weed party skimming votes here and there. Makes it an easy choice for other parties to grab that vote by helping make it happen. There's so much tax to be made there, it's worked well elsewhere, just get on with it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I know a lot of people are for it. I'd not vote against it. But only if we treat it like alcohol and tobacco. We have to be typical Australians when it comes to weed, the North American 'green coast' as they call it have gone overboard. Too strong, too prominent, too loose regulatory regime. In saying that there seems a genuinely well meaning participants, so its not all bad over there.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Absolutely. I'd even be inclined to put it in pharmacy's like the MMJ already is and they take your drivers license details when you buy it. Like with the restricted over the counter medications eg, sudafed and rikodiene.