Kayel

joined 2 years ago
[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed, still off topic. This really was meant to be a global economics piece, not a politics piece.

Obviously I think more needs to be done on housing - end capt. gains discount for property, neg. gearing. But agreed.

What do you is going to happen when the Americans wake up? I think both of us are going to get some replies.

I might delete my comments. This was off topic

Edit: My off topic comments have been removed.

They were off topic and not conducive to the conversation. I regret getting off topic.

Notifying you they have changed since your response.

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 6 points 4 months ago

Is the change in unequal exchange more impactful than Capital accumulation, etc. - I'd like to know. Either way, cost of living is not improving.

I am interested in critical response on whether the increase in productivity will balance out the equalisation of exchange.

But my, unsubstantiated, view is equalisation of trade will increase cost of living even with productivity considered.

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

Trade with China is essential to Australia, don't get me wrong, the profit of the trade has, and will, change.

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

I am referring to unequal trade, - us getting more in return from the Global South (Asia, south america, Africa, etc.) for what we're giving them.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59881-1

https://globalinequality.org/unequal-exchange/

This is true for our trade with China, but I am specifically speaking generally.

"China’s exchange ratio with the Global North has improved over time. During the 1990s, the exchange ratio was on average 34 to 1. In other words, for every unit of embodied labour, materials, land and energy that China imported from the Global North, they had to export 34 units to pay for it. As of 2015, the ratio had declined to 4 to 1." https://progressive.international/wire/2025-04-18-china-unequal-exchange-and-the-present-world-historic-juncture/en

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095937802200005X

Does that answer your question?

 

Australia and the West have experienced, hand over fist, improvements in GDP and living standards since we moved our manufacturing and resource extraction overseas*.

Even as the working class got sold out**, living standards improved across the board. The rich got richer and so did the middle class - with most Australians joining the middle class, during and, since the post-war era.

We were getting a good deal on our imports, taking more from poorer countries (Global South) than we gave in return, but that has been coming to an end.

The Global North (the First World) has monopolised trade with the Global South, by Capital and demand but also coercion and regime change, which ensured a good deal. But with the rise of the BRIX and China's Belt and Road initiative, the Global South has more opportunity for equal exchange of goods and services.

While the IMF used third world debt to influence policy change, allowing Western Capital to buy up and exploit industry, Chinese banks are forgiving debts and negotiating mutually beneficial agreements (to the benefit of China).

While Western Capital built limited infrastructure to extract a specific resource, China is investing in not just general infrastructure but education and the creation of a local workforce.

The Global South are trading with each other. They have more options, trade is more competitive - we get less of a deal.

Where previously Australia could afford to give Corporations absurd profits and still have money for the people, this will be less and less possible. Australia needs to re-embrace the policies of the post-war era, which ensured a dignified life, and roll back the last 50 years of neoliberal policy built for an age which no longer exists.

* Not just in the neoliberal era, but all the way back to the start of colonial expansion.

** With manufacturing moving overseas and the denationalisation by various Liberal -and some Labor- governments.

*** consent manufacturing became harder to enforce

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-49687-y

[2] https://ourworldindata.org/trade-and-globalization

[3] https://www.bu.edu/gdp/2021/03/08/bailouts-from-beijing-how-china-functions-as-an-alternative-to-the-imf/

[4] https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2377740023500173

CC SA NC

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

No. These policies don't.

Which policy and why?

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Do not tax income

  • Tax wealth (progressively)
  • Take royalties for mining
  • Remove the capital gains discount

An income tax is an attack on workers

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago

Do not tax income

  • Tax wealth
  • Take royalties for mining
  • Remove the capital gains discount

An income tax is an attack on workers

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 0 points 4 months ago

The article is very clear on the timeline.

Funnelled is correct, these contracts are not easy to get access to.

I would also be interested in a further breakdown of contracts and time frames. I suggest Defence release this information.

As stated further down, the genocide has been going on for many decades. Australia is complicit.

 

The Australian Government has funnelled $2.5B of public funding to Israeli arms manufacturers via government contracts. Steph Tran investigates.

[–] Kayel@aussie.zone 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Neoliberalism is reaching its natural conclusion, coupled with the gradual fall of colonialism, is going to lead to a permanent crash for the working class.

While Trump is being loud, the project to divide the US working class by ethnicity has been ongoing always, and began ramping up this century.

It will be required as all production is centralised within a handful of families. And the global south can no longer be relied on for cheap resources and manufacturing for middle class treats.

The US doesn't have a union presence, nor does it have understanding of left politics. Conditions will get worse and worse every decade.

 

I haven't seen much reporting on this.

No one is surprised Labor have the Assembly, but that's all the media seem to be reporting on.

https://www.elections.wa.gov.au/elections/state/sgelection#/sg2025

 

It's honestly a bit boring, eat your veggies, eat well, exercise, socialise, don't poison yourself

 

I am accessing the NHL tv streaming site geoblocked from a country who has limited interest in hockey (hence no fighting amongst SN, ESPN, etc.). However I have been finding free streaming to be as reliable and, sometimes, better quality.

Trying to access all games has been a nightmare to do through official companies. How's your experience been?

 

Southeast Asia begins to meet their growing demand for beef. Heralding in more feedlots, cattlefeed farming, land degradation, phosphate overgrowths and greenhouse gas emotions.

view more: next ›