this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
34 points (94.7% liked)

politics

22829 readers
3650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s reaction to Donald Trump walking past her at his joint congressional address went viral: “She looks like she couldn't despise him more in this clip.”

Barrett, who was appointed by Trump in 2020, sided with a 5-4 Supreme Court majority to uphold a lower court order unfreezing $2 billion in foreign aid, drawing criticism from Trump supporters.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe she shouldn't have voted to make him immune from consequences then.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah she was all happy when she got to handmaiden away women's rights, but now she's worried about the authoritarian stank that's left on her? Wonder what changed.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There has been a lot of real unironic talk amongst the GOP to remove women senators and judges from power. Or maybe Trump tried to rape her, wouldn't surprise me in the least.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I actually think that was from the smell of him walking by. Seriously.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 3 points 1 month ago

would be funny that in a room full of old people, trump's old people smell somehow outpowers the rest XD

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

SCOTUS should be elected.

If a political party appoints a Judge then it is not possible for that judge to be unbiased.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Maybe she just caught a whiff of his diaper load.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Apparently, he does smell. Really bad. One of the least surprising things I’ve read recently.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

It's incredible that nobody (like foreign leaders) has ever said anything when they're both on camera... Like come on. I would love to hear some German Minister or something, all serious, be like, "vat ist dat smellz?" while in the middle of a photo op or sit down discussion or some shit... Just to see how Trump reacts.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's exactly what I thought. Women tend to have a better sense of smell than men. Also, some people are super smellers - I wondered if she might be one when I saw that clip.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

It’s totally this, the stench must have been overpowering on that fateful night.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That look of complete disgust and distain? It's like she was channeling Melania

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I thought the same thing.

[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is Amy Coney Barrett a Republican?

Supreme Court justices do not serve under a political party. Barrett is considered to be among the Court's conservatives, but she has served as a swing vote in some controversial cases.

Lol sure.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I heard Amy Coney Barrett was a RINO. Many people came to me and said Sir. she is a closet left wing liberal lunatic. But she came to me with tears in her eyes, begging for a job. I should have thrown her out like a dog. What a TOTAL LOSER!

--@RealDonaldTrump

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Best thing ever was the trump criticizes Trump deal.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anyone have a link to a non-twitter source?

[–] CoffeeBreakfast@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Nah, there was nothing malicious in her expression at all. She was looking at him with admiration and a smile. But her facial muscles sprang back to bitchface and that's what happened.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really like to use the Libredirect plugin, by the way....helps you avoid even accidentally sending traffic to sites that you select, and instead, sends them to alternatives.

https://libredirect.github.io/index.html

The only thing is that is does not seem to solve the Facebook problem. I'm not sure if there are any solutions out there for that.

[–] CaptSneeze@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sounds like it’s worth checking out. Thanks for the tip!

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Doesn't look like she's looking at him at all, staring at someone/something inthe background before Trump walks over

[–] Norgoroth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably just smelled his soiled McDiaper and stale ketchup aroma

[–] hyperion@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure this is it

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh. I never realized she looked like an older Pam Beesly

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

You take that right the fuck back! Seriously though, if Pam got addicted to Parliament cigarettes and dog racing, this would be who she became.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Bad actress, 1/5

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She looks like the leopard ate her face and she understands why it did. But as long as she upholds the Constitution, that's all you could ask for.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She's already gutted the Constitution. She helped evolve the argument that (and then voted that) he's immune to anything he can claim as an "official act", and now everything will be an "official act". She helped him get back into office, now he can ignore the courts, including the Supreme Court - we already know no one is going to stop him. She had the chance to stop this and she failed.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Well maybe the leopard just ate her face. Not she hasn't done shitty things but better late than never since her seat is for life.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Liberal "resistance" consists of devoting your entire life to serving a violent empire while wearing a wacky costume, then turning up your nose at the physical manifestation of your work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the traditional meaning of the words, all Republicans and Democrats are conservative liberals. Does that seem like an oxymoron? It's not, we've just twisted the word liberal to mean not conservative in the US. Progressive is a much better word for people who are against the conservative agenda.

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What the fuck are you on about, she is literally a christofascist sect member that wants to turn the USA into a real world enactment of The Handmaids Tale.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Agreed 💯. I wasn't talking about her specifically, just the way words have changed meaning over time, specifically in the US.