this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

9464 readers
1635 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What is Alexander Panetta's problem with Canada? Is he an American or a fifth columnist of snark. CBC might want to consider someone capable of writing analysis without trashing Canada.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those factors will likely pack more punch in Washington than the $155 billion in counter-tariffs threatened by Canada. To put this number in perspective, it's a fraction of what American stock markets have lost this week.

That's a pretty dumb take when you consider that a major cause of those losses is the market factoring in the cost of Canadian retaliatory tariffs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you're maybe misunderstanding the direction of the tarrifs costs?

The tarrifs cost American importers regardless of our counter tarrifs. For an example, the article pointed to, Target which

said it expected to raise prices within days, specifically mentioning Mexican strawberries, bananas and avocados

Doesn't matter what counter tarrifs Mexico puts in place, produce from Mexico will be more expensive in America. Counter tarrifs just make things more expensive in our own country and hopefully dissuade people from buying them.

The markets aren't roiling because of reduced access to Canadian markets, it's that the stuff in their own products (like say, car parts made in Canada) overnight became 25% more expensive. (I would also be surprised if we tarrifed much in our shared industries like auto production as it'll be hard enough to keep those factories here without making them even more expensive.)

That's not to say what we do is irrelevant, we should absolutely boycott and do whatever we can to make the markets worse but it's good to do so with clear eyes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No I'm well aware of how tariffs work. The thing is, given how tightly coupled our economies are, nearly all major US manufacturing is heavily dependent on Canadian exports. Our auto industry alone has a single vehicle traversing the border multiple times. When we impose a counter-tariff, that hurts US industry considerably. Couple this, with the lost good will between the US and it's biggest trading partner by far, and you've got a a massive devaluation of US stock prices due to diversification and boycotts alone.

In other words, the dude's not wrong that the market hit is massive, he's just got blinders on around the cause.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I understand your comment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Panetta slags Canada in his lede.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

LoL that's not any better. I'm pretty fluent in English but this phrase makes no sense to me. Lede?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Bury the Lede:

fail to emphasize the most important part of a story or account.

Edit: the person's comment still doesn't make sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No worries bud. I'm as confused as you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Legend 👍

How'd you know I was too lazy to look it up again?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you want him to lie about the sizes of our relative economies?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I want him to not be a snarky little prick.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Canada's retaliation, at least the 30 to 150 billion announced, is small potatoes on the scale of the massive US economy, that's not snark but a fact.

But I think the writer is giving sufficient credence to the notion that despite that difference in size, we have an outsized ability to turn the screws (like Doug Ford is) when already the US administration is screwing itself 6 ways to Sunday.

Had we as Canadians acted with indifference to these threats, the sense of urgency of the true effects of MAGA and Trumpism might not be conveyed clearly enough, since American media is distracted by 1000 scandals going at once, and the White House and Republicans' Congress are now like a Ministry of Alternative Facts.