this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
185 points (96.5% liked)

News

36439 readers
2357 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A top White House official has threatened to redraw the Canadian border amid Donald Trump’s ambition to turn the country in America’s “51st state”.

Peter Navarro, one of Donald Trump’s closest advisers, is pushing US negotiators to discuss reworking the border with their Canadian counterparts, The Telegraph can reveal.

“Navarro recommended revising the Canada-US border, which is just crazy and dangerous,” a source close to negotiations told The Telegraph.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is actually fucking ridiculous

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"ridiculous" is a rather generous way to express the absolute lunatic raving idiocy involved in even considering consolidating a sovereign nation (Canada, FFS??) into the fantastical ravings of a Napoleonic miserable little toddler's colonialist dreams in search of some lasting legacy other than first felonious criminal that made it to occupant of the oval office.

🤦‍♀️ 🖕 🖕

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Raise your hand if you believe this was all started because Putin told Trump it was a good idea.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Canada got serious about pursuing the money behind the freedom convoy and designated a bunch of those groups as domestic terrorists. By law Canada can go after everyone who funded them which, unsurprisingly, is largely Russia via right wing organizations in the US.

Trump probably got a letter from the "Canadian bureau of land management" (Putin) which pleaded with him to take Canada in

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If there is an American/Canadian war, I'll sign up on the side of the Canadians. - An American

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why I don't think it will ever happen.

US Miliary personnel have worked hand in hand with the Canadians half a century doing everything from joint ops to sharing bases. I think a lot of them would simply refuse to invade Canada without congress first declaring an official war, and congress wouldn't do that because it would be horrifically unpopular with the US populace.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago

Congress is majority R, I wouldn't put it past them.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

“We protect Canada, but it’s not fair. It’s not fair that they’re not paying their way, and if they had to pay their way they couldn’t exist,” he told reporters.

FUCK YOU

[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sorry America, but you’ve gone Anakin Skywalker. You are now the bad guys.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, maybe America was always the bad guy, but had (mostly) good people in control of checks and balances. Like, it was always Anakin, but had Obiwan keeping on eye on things.

But now Obiwan is dead and America is in the tower chopping up kids.

[–] galanthus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

America is Palpatine.

It just revealed that it was the sith lord all along.

[–] WarlockoftheWoods@lemy.lol 6 points 1 year ago

Yeaaaaah, a lot of us hate ot here, it isn't like 35% of us that are the douchebags.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What in the actual fuck?

What are they (I doubt he's smart enough to pull all of this off on his own) doing while we're all aghast at this stupidity?

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[–] ImperialATAT@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, I’m cool with redrawing the Canadian border… as long as we add the West Coast to Canada.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

CA here, I'd like to be able to afford healthcare thanks. Our GDP would help Canada tremendously, it's a fair trade.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

When a slight-of-hand trick is in progress, be sure to watch what the other hand is doing.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My guess is that Medicaid cuts are the big one. Cutting Medicaid ain't popular. It would probably be very much undesirable for Trump and more-generally the GOP if that were the major topic of discussion on social media.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Canada is running down the funding sources behind the freedom convoy. A bunch of involved domestic groups have been officially labelled domestic terrorists meaning everyone involved in funding them is on the hook. A whole bunch of that money was laundered through far right wing supporters in the US.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not how this works, that's not how any of this works

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is, actually, how it works. See: every other border dispute.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can't arbitrarily redraw an international border without negotiation

The United Nations Charter prohibits the annexation of a state's territory by another state through the use of force. Annexation is considered an act of aggression and a violation of international law

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny thing about International Law. It only ever seems to apply when when someone has the will and the power to enforce it. Who has the power to enforce it if the US is the guilty party?

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sanctions

The US has a LOT of trading partners

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

And yet it regularly happens with little consequence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I mean he could nuke the border, that's the other way to deal with hurricanes right?

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OMG, I'm going to be too embarrassed to move to Canada.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we put the revised boarder far enough south, you won't need to move

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Now you're talking!

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Make it so say we all.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Maybe south of Seattle? Lol.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The hamberders can not give this guy a heart attack fast enough.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You mind drawing it a bit south actually

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 year ago

A class of children playing classroom-united-nations would be slammed by their teacher for doing this as "unrealistic".

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

So, what's the distraction for, Medicaid, social security, the slow march into a christofascist dicatorship? (Nah, they like that last one)

[–] thebigslime@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Give Canada Point Roberts, WA and the Northwest Angle, MN.

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In for all of Cascadia tbh

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The Pacific States of America has a nice ring to it

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

which had been paused for 30 days after Mr Trudeau agreed to take action against illegal migration and drug trafficking into the US.

Putting a bit of spin on it. Their plans were already in place before Trump came into office. This makes it seem like the US actually got a concession.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Also more fentanyl comes into Canada from the USA than out... That’s not even mentioning the guns

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Peter Navarro is not a serious person. He’s a fucking moron and he always has been.

load more comments
view more: next ›