Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
This is how someone who has no idea how to manage output or productivity thinks you should manage output and productivity.
My manager, a CFO in a startup was like this. He implemented it, making us write down everything we did. And so I did. In details. Spent more time writing the report than working. Left the company 6 weeks after implementation. Then they needed 3 people to replace me HAHAHA fuck you Lena and Michael!
Guy who does nothing demands to know how workers spend their time.
Ah he's back on that "show me the lines of code you wrote" trip
We’ve already been instructed to ignore it. 😆
"I have people skills!! What the hell is wrong with you people!?"
Just ignore him. He isn't in charge of DOGE, right GOP?
Edit: what the fuck power does DOGE have anyway? The president doesn't have the right to unilaterally create a random department without a congressional vote.
Trump doesn’t care. Nobody is stopping him. He disregards judges who find against his actions.
The republicans are sitting on their hands seeing which way the wind blows if they’re not actively supporting trump.
The dems are powerless and disorganized if they aren’t negotiating with the opposition.
Absolutely nobody is actively attacking the status quo except people like Sanders and maybe AOC.
The president can do whatever the rest of government lets him do.
Send this
You show me yours and I'll show you mine, Elon.
I'm so torn about this as an activity. Telling my bosses what I've accomplished each week has been part of my regular work for 2 decades - so this doesn't feel like an unreasonable request and I'm a bit surprised the info is not at the ready. But Musk is absolutely the wrong person to make the request and any decisions based on the information received.
I saw patients this past week. Like I do every week. That is my one bullet point. I still need 4 more bullet points??? This is ridiculous. I'm doing my job, that I have been asked to do. He doesn't know what my job is. The AI they are going to feed my answer through doesn't know what my job is. The people who do know what my job is know that I am doing it just fine. We already have an evaluation system that I have to sign every 6 months and submit bullet points with.
My supervisor, and their supervisors, are now going to have meetings about us responding. Then we are going to be told in meetings about how to respond. Then I spend some arbitrary amount of time responding. Do you have any idea how much combined time across the entire government is being waisted on this? This is literally millions of dollars in total time waisted just for the whims of a mad man. This is a prime example of wasting tax dollars.
It is shit leadership if your supervisors don't know what you do (this is like a massive pet peeve of mine - that's like literally their only job). And, possibly to your point, if your leadership can't articulate what your team is doing, it puts your job at risk, when really they should be removing layers of management. But all of this is beside the point, because Musk shouldn't be the one doing it.
This information is at the ready — for the people who actually need to know it (i.e., the actual chain of command, not self-appointed billionaires of made up departments).
I don't work there, so I have no idea if the info is readily available (I hope it is for the sake of efficiency of our agencies). But, to your point, it shouldn't be sent to Musk.
I mean you assume it's being sent to Musk. We don't actually know. It's not a secured government email. Who fucking knows where it's going or who's seeing it.
I thought that as well. My guess is they do, but you're right it should not be a request coming from him, and it absolutely shouldn't be in a threatening manner either. I'm assuming many don't want to respond because they aren't even sure if this should be allowed. Of course, many are quickly realizing everything is allowed now.
Just say you saved $55 billion dollars.
Nobody on their team is capable of doing the math to check.
I'm sure they'll just toss them into some ai program to evaluate. Probably can't be bothered to even evaluate the results themselves.
He'll just fire those who don't reply. It's a "power move" not a legitimate management technique.
Sounds like a good time to make some shit up.
dealt with the barrage of official and unofficial edicts trying to verify which ones are lega.
What email address do they use to accept the reports?
He's going to bog them down by making them account for their actions. Then when productivity goes down he will either fire the worker or shutter the department.