this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
188 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

15714 readers
2193 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I owe my soul to the company store.....

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Next stop, severance minus the outie part.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, for fuck's sake. I started reading this thinking it was satire, and after it just kept going did I realize that this was serious, and not just some long-form ribbing.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We really need a term opposite to "eat the onion".

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I really shat the yam on that one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know. I think the opposite of an onion would be an orange not a yam.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Well the opposite of eat would be barf, so, "horked the orange"?

Edit: a word

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I thought horking was snorting. Huh. I wonder whether that’s ever led to communication issues.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can. It's called Work From Home.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

That’s why they can’t

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And pay them with company specific crypto they can spend in the company store.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You push 16 branches, and what do you Git?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Another day older and more tech debt

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

@saint_peter don't you page me, 'cause I crashed the repo----

I owe my soul

to the bezostore

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago

Corporations: "We will literally do anything to avoid giving our employees dedicated workspace where they can do their job uninterrupted."

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

Company towns coming back as company apartments.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

in the key of G "and I sold my soul to the company stoooooooore"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Glad to see someone on the same page. I read the title and immediately thought SAINT PETER DONTCHA CALL ME 'CAUSE I CAN'T GOOOOOOO

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Sure, let me take a dump on your desk too.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why not cut this slippery slope crap and just go straight to slavery?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they stopped themselves from being literally The Onion just in time

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I find it hard to believe he'd just table the idea at that point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

After the employees realise it's just slaves

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Slaves are more expensive since you have to treat them as capital.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Nah, you generally can depreciate capitalized assets /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Only if they're regulated. Or if salaried workers have any rights, since you could otherwise just conspire with other companies to push salaries down, ensuring ~~"free" slaves~~ collaborating individual entrepreneurs are cheaper

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"No, no, no, it's not a company town... it's a company tower... which is completely different. By the way, did you meet Brian? He's the new manager of the convenience store the company opened in the lobby. It's right next to the company elementary school. You can use the company issued script to buy stuff there, it's great!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I'm sure it was your autocorrect, but for anyone who doesn't know it, the term is "scrip" :)

Wait, I should type :( because it's a very depressing concept.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

It happens, sometimes, if you're hiring someone to work in a remote location. Oil rig workers, say.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

No. They are absolutely desperate to get people to return to office aren’t they?

I’ve said it many times now. The workhouses are coming back.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

SCP 001 : 05 the Factory

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's what happened here. The mines gave apartments to the miners. The higher ups lived in better ones etc. Worked out well till the mines weren't profitable anymore

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Nah, Europe isn't as ducked as the US, the apartments just went to them and the city moved away from mining

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Can I pay in company scrips?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I get the dystopia but if a company gave me an apartment in the city along with family healthcare where they pay 100% of medical costs. I would take minimum wage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And your employer would own you. You couldn't afford to ever tell them "No".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

are you kidding. I would be able to save more than ever before and have an easier time leaving.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

This reminds me of the Onion episode where the staff from two different car manufacturing plants fight for there jobs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, let them work from home.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's the idea.
When the office becomes the home, they are working from home.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you want your office to be home?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

No. I like having two different places for work stuff and not work stuff.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To actually address the question, it's because commercial buildings don't (generally) meet residential building code requirements, even if there's a kitchenette and a shower, etc. They are simply not meant for the same purpose or to be occupied 24/7 unless they were engineered that way from the start, which is exceedingly rare. A lot of office buildings have floor-to-ceiling windows and complex HVAC systems simply to make sure people aren't cold, breathing stale air, or too humid/dry, so they also use a lot of energy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Also fire safety, if you have people sleeping in the building you need a much higher level of protection.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Why not let children live in womb ?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Abso-fucking-lutely not.

load more comments
view more: next ›