this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
156 points (99.4% liked)

Crazy Fucking Videos

8560 readers
80 users here now

Dive into the World of Insane Videos!

Rules

  1. No hate speech of any kind.
  2. Content warnings are required in post titles where applicable. Example: [CW: Injury]
  3. Use your best judgement and mark NSFW posts as such.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"The crash caused significant damage to the aircraft". Um, what aircraft? You mean that hole in the ground?

Glad the pilot's OK.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't the failure rate on the F 35 like WAY higher than previous fighters? Oh well, at least Lockheed got that sweet, sweet contract, right?

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

Arguably F-35 have more failure points. I say this as an ex F-18 mechanic so you probably can't take me at my word

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

It has extremely low flight time. There is also "Right to repair" issues in favour of manufacturer where they don't provide adequate manuals to keep the aircraft operational. Decline of US is affected by military mission to spend more money to political donors rather than provide value to Armed Forces.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Google says that thing cost somewhere between $82MM - $109MM. I wonder how many meals it could have been instead.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

As of July 2024, the average flyaway costs per plane are: US$82.5 million for the F-35A, $109 million for the F-35B, and $102.1 million for the F-35C.

Wikipedia.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats a lot of millimeter dollars.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My country benefits from military surplus aides from the U. S. I wouldn't mind if America takes care of it's children first.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The R&D on that jet would have solved world hunger and provided free healthcare for the whole US. Instead, we kill our pilots with them. Excellent use of funds.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 1 year ago

That doesn't look like a normal landing. They should have strapped a cat to it to stabilize the axis.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's gonna be a lot of paperwork

[–] DarkShaggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And meetings to discuss / review the paperwork...

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Isn't that the second F35 in a few weeks? I can remember another F35 having a nose gear failure with the pilot ejecting at ground level.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't find anything in the last few weeks, there was one nearly a year ago. No ejection though.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

You're right, I saw an older video and took it as new: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9GBHNaYzcs

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Shit'll buff out

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I missing something? I’m not seeing a video in the post or at the link

[–] Wilshire@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whilst in technically true that the plane was landing, I don't think he was actually making a landing.

Looked a lot more like the plane wasn't under power at all.

[–] eRac@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

Landing gear were down, so it was likely coming in for a landing when the incident occurred. Based on the height and positioning, maybe an attempted go-around that ended in abandoning the craft entirely.