this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
347 points (97.8% liked)

politics

30960 readers
2032 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump called TikTok "worthless" and suggested he might not intervene to lift its nationwide ban, which took effect on January 19 over national security concerns about its Chinese ownership.

Previously, Trump had pledged to save TikTok, citing its role in his campaign's social media success, but his latest remarks hinted at demands for U.S. ownership of the platform.

House Speaker Mike Johnson supported the ban, citing fears of Chinese influence on TikTok's algorithms.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 182 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Man, I really hope he does the double-flipflop on this and bans it again. Because Tiktok pulled the stunt this weekend to kiss his ass, blocking the app preemptively for the USA and crediting Trump with "saving" it with the popup message. This would be most disruptive to the propaganda pushers on both sides of the globe, and piss off the most people against them.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 85 points 2 years ago (3 children)

u-turning so fast he's basically drifting in circles.

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you're on to something...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FediNeko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

It will be especially funny because they have had a lot more conservative type join as well, and based off everyone complaining about their "algorithm" it seems like those types are enjoying themselves...

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

it amuses me that people expect anything else from his presidency. it will be a "highest bidder wins" war.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 126 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Donald Trump says dumb fucking thing after other dumb fucking contradictory thing"

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Onion should just print this headline every day for the next 4 years.

[–] Vladkar@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Nah, that's too realistic for The Onion. It needs to be something like, 'Pandemonium Ensues After Trump Utters First Coherent Sentence.'

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 years ago

And this strategy works for him just fine. People who like him will believe the thing they want to hear and some of the people who would have opposed him will be confused and delay action because they think maybe it's just going to work out and they should focus elsewhere.

[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago

Bidding war. Zuckerberg paid more.

Your move China.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Imagine having your entire business plans hanging on the whims of this orange dickhead.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

I suspect it's a share price influencing game with some of his pals.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 51 points 2 years ago

Check bounced? Nah he got the check and it cleared and the world's tiniest gear spun in his head and he thought "what if 2 checks?!?!!?".

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (4 children)

That was a strange video to listen to. He wants the US to own half... Like nationalizing the platform?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 71 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He wants his cut, like the mafia

[–] TorJansson@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

To "wet his beak"

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think he understands the difference between a government and a corporation. Like, he imagines the US is just his now. Just a big hotel, he can buy and sell bits of it to make money. Buy Greenland and Tiktok, sell Puerto Rico and the USS George Bush. Add a cover charge for Canada and Mexico.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 years ago

To be fair, at this point there is barely any difference.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Obviously not like that, but wants it privately owned by his "American" cronies... like Elon

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Interestingly, there were rumors that during those meetings in the article putin asked the oligarchs for half, but would provide protection, government subsidies,etc. So 50%, but more money then ever possible. Those that balked got thrown out a window.

Trump says US, but might really mean himself.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Meta dropped a bigger check maybe.

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago

Elno reminded him he owns both X and Trump.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 9 points 2 years ago

Probably did. Could easily be a grifter move to dupe them into writing another check. Suckers.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 26 points 2 years ago

He logged in and instead of seeing people praising him, he saw people continue to mock him and call him a dumb, fascist, piece of shit.

[–] flying_gel@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I think it's a threat to ensure that TikTok does what he says. Lots of reports (that I as an Australian can't verify before it works for me) of searches for Trump incriminating videos are returning no results since it came back. It feels like there were conditions on not banning TikTok.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago
[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Guess they didn't donate enough to his inauguration fund.

[–] zib@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I'm getting whiplash from all the backtracking and it's only day two.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I was sticking with rednote anyway.

spoiler

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

I was sticking to not joining social media owned by people who want to make profit with my info...

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even if this were psy-ops... this is how you write psy-ops, goddamn

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

He's talking big so that Tiktok sells their US operations to Elon. Then he gets to take credit as a deal maker.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What pisses me off the most is that he blatantly places no consideration about the security implications of this decision. It is just about making a deal for his tech bros.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He doesn’t give a flying fuck about the country. He’d burn it all down if it could turn a profit for him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Did tiktok not offer to kiss his ass or pay him tribute like all the other companies?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bdot@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

let me guess? Zuckerberg phoned him up and reminded him of all that lovely lobby money that had been shared around!

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

He meant that TikTok's gratuities are worth less than Zuckerberg and Musk's.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 7 points 2 years ago

Old man yells at rock. Old man becomes friend with rock. Old man yells at rock.

load more comments
view more: next ›