334
Just to confirm, there's no plan to subsidize the rebuilding of $40,000,000 mansions, right?
this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
334 points (99.1% liked)
News
28477 readers
4401 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don’t know about the US, but in the UK, rebuilding would be covered by the homeowner’s buildings insurance.
Although insurance companies would probably try to claim it as an Act Of God to get out of it. Don’t know how that would go legally…
I'm an Atheist. Act of God is nonsense. What does it even mean? It can mean whatever the fucking insurance wants it to mean and it's horseshit
Privatize the profits, socialize the losses…
I’m an atheist that understands that an act of god refers to any destructive natural event where the damage to property couldn’t have been reasonably prevented. And insurance companies detail exactly what is and isn’t covered per policy; it’s just that they can get away with denying coverage due to lack of oversight/policing of them.
I Germany we call it "Höhere Gewalt". While that can refer to something supernatural, it just means "higher force" and I think it does a good job as a term.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Isn’t that what insurance is for?
Insurance is literally a market of risk assessments. The odds of any given event are x, y and z and the cost of each of those events are a, b, and c. Take the number of people who are applying for policies and spread the cost based on the risks and figure out how much each needs to pay to be able to cover x, y or z should/when any of them occur. There’s discussions to be had on how much a percentage of profit should be allowable on the top and how much to subsidize on known high risk coverage that is not mathematically reasonable but it all boils down to buying risk based on the chance and cost of any given event happening. Act of God/Force Majeure make complete sense when framing it this way. The insurance policy is based on known and predicted risks. You don’t have volcano insurance in NJ and you don’t have hurricane insurance in Kansas because they aren’t expected disasters so they aren’t included in the risk calculations. Act of God is a catch all term for things beyond the expected scope of the policy which is based on clearly established limits and scenarios.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Read your contracts, the things that fall under this moniker will be listed.
Yeah wtf with the religious taint. That's what I call all these stupid terms that creep into secular government and businesses because it reminds me of the Zerg's creep from StarCraft. Lol
No, fire insurance is a required part of home owners insurance in California, at least for now, but I'm sure the cost of this fire will have insurers squirming to get out of that.
Hopefully their insurers won't go bankrupt
I don’t know about the US, but in the UK, rebuilding would be covered by the homeowner’s buildings insurance.
A lot of these places were dropped from their insurance because insurance companies made the risk calculation.
Acts of God are covered by homeowners insurance unless explicitly stated otherwise. A homeowner in the Palisades without fire insurance is.....playing with fire.
A homeowner in the Palisades without fire insurance probably doesn't have it because their insurance company dropped them, after doing the calculations and realizing how likely a fire was
I haven't read the articles but there's a bunch of headlines that insurance companies were dropping a lot of houses in the Palisades area.
Very much depends on the insurance held
Holy shit, if that's how they wanna play this, God's telling me to shoot some insurance fucks.
Josh Johnson had a joke something like:
Luigi can easily get out of it by taking the stand and going:
I tried to call them, but I was on hold for so long that it just seemed faster to deal with it in person. I wanted to tell them I was crazy.
Obviously better phrased, better paced better everything. Incredible
FEMA provides assistance to make essential repairs to homes in some instances, but does not provide rebuilding assistance is my understanding. They do provide funding for temporary shelter and essential supplies, but those amounts are not tied to income.
No mention of rebuilding subsidies for homeowners. I assume they’ll be assisting with state-funded infrastructure after recovery as well.
Meeting with federal officials at the White House, Biden said the funds would go toward debris removal, temporary shelters, salaries for first responders and more for 180 days.
Isn't that why you have insurance
For sure, it is. But in the likely event that insurance providers somehow deny the claim, the cynic in me expects the government to provide socialized support for the wealthy as soon as it can.
Because the wealthy are always made whole. It's only the working class who can't stand up for themselves who are generally taken advantage of by insurance agencies.
Rich tend to have power and influence. If biden wants to create a legacy for him and his associates (whether his kins or the party members), he needs to serve the rich people's needs first and foremost.
It is only rational that he does that. Isn't it?
Proof that there's always money from Uncle Sam to help the super rich.
There are plenty of people affected by this fire who are not super rich. Something like 1 in 34 Americans lives in LA County, IIRC, and most of them aren’t super rich. Yes the Palisades area is pretty affluent, but not all of the surrounding areas are. What’s more, the effort to STOP the fire protects everyone.
Besides, most of who we think of as rich in LA is nowhere near the level of the ultra-wealthy whose wealth we should be redistributing. The 400 richest Americans have over $5 trillion in wealth. A-list actors and directors and movie producers are a drop in the bucket in comparison.
The numbers in this are now out of date because it’s from 2021, but it’s still worth looking at.
Oh, I'm not opposed to stopping the fires. the best way way to do that is to tax anyone burning fossil fuels out of existence.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Two co-workers of my other half lost homes, one lost a family member too. They are service workers, I can assure you they are not rich.
Perhaps you prefer everyone gets nothing as long as it prevents the rich from getting anything too? That’s some republican level thinking - y’know, where no poor people get any help because a freeloader or two might get something.
I think the heart of the accusation is "initial" in the headline. We're all seeing a repeat of bank bailouts, ppp loans, etc, where the bucket is going to run out immediately before anybody who actually needs it gets a drop, and everybody else is going to end up footing the bill.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Trump will let Cali burn.
B u better get them checks signed right now
Might as well make the last time it ever happens a good one.
Good call, Joe.
Its so that 47 cant walk it back and hold the state hostage by witholding relief funds... Again.
Then California withholds it's funds to the federal government...
And here I am still waiting on FEMA to get their shit together and get me the money they owe me from over 3 months ago.
Say what you want about him but the military is sending 10 water helicopters and every fire plane it has. There's also over a thousand ground personnel going to help. And if you've looked at the fire recently you'll see why, there's a real danger it breaks into the semi-urban area.
Trump would 100% be laughing while playing.the liar (lyre)
Isn't that socialism or communism or government over reach though? How can Republicans stand for this?!
view more: next ›