this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
376 points (99.2% liked)

News

35821 readers
2056 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

New York judge Juan Merchan denied Donald Trump's request to delay his sentencing on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, set for January 10, 2025, just 10 days before his inauguration.

Trump argued for a delay based on pending immunity appeals, but the court rejected the claim, citing repetitive arguments and delays caused by Trump himself.

Prosecutors noted the timing avoids potential legal complications during his presidency.

The judge plans to sentence Trump to an unconditional discharge, leaving him a convicted felon without further punishment.

The case involves hush money payments from 2016.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 197 points 1 year ago (3 children)

'judge refuses to delay slap on wrist'

fucking waste of everyones time. too rich to punish... its the american way

[–] morgan_423@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he pronounces no sentence except for sticking the felon branding, then it isn't even a slap on the wrist. It doesn't affect him in any way whatsoever, even after his term is over.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well, he can't legally vote in many states ... so there's that at least.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems like McDonald's has tougher job requirements than our highest position.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tougher job requirements and easier to punish you when you fuck up. Hell, you don’t even have to fuck up that bad and this idiot’s about to tank the entire country even worse and lose nothing.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Hey, you dropped this:

,again

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Except he can in Florida where he lives and where voting rights are restored upon fulfilling all terms of your sentence... so nothing.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not even a slap on the wrist, they're just closing out the trial and letting him walk.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

“Yeah they found you guilty, but don’t worry, we’re not gonna do anything”

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, the moment he postponed July sentencing it was clear that the whole thing was a mockery of our judicial system.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 84 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I wish I could commit felonies with impunity too.

Although, come to think of it, I don't really want to commit felonies, because I'm not a criminal.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I admit I do get away with committing a lot of felonies.

Well, one specific felony a lot of times.

Glad I was able to go to a state where that felony is legal to purchase before the big snowstorm hit.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] unclejeeves@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wouldn't mind robbing a bank., I'll just keep a 10% finders fee and return the rest to the people it was stolen from.

(Okay, it really depends on the bank you rob and how you rob it. looting nazis acounts from UBS? Oh yeah, there's oodles there.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'll never be president with that attitude.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not trying to. I respect myself and my country too much.

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Reluctant leaders are often better anyway....

I was about to say "ExtremeDullard for president!" But realized people might think I'm a Trump supporter.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude, so much awesome shit is illegal. How can you NOT want to commit a felony?

I'd do financial crimes targeting the ultrawealthy and redistribute the wealth. I'd hack banks and clear everyone's medical debt. Hell, I'd cook a huge vat of LSD.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Have you tried? Maybe you're immune to and you just don't know.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guess which of these sentences aren't in the article.

"The current schedule is entirely a function of defendant’s repeated requests to adjourn"

"Merchan said in his ruling Friday that he did not plan to jail Trump and that he was likely to sentence him to an unconditional discharge, meaning he would remain a convicted felon but would have no other punishment"

"We are not to blame for flushing democracy down a shit riddled toilet"

How the fuck can we ever take our courts seriously again?

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is some twisted logic to this. Your'e right, the system is broken, but this decision potentially avoids the constitutional crisis of whether a president can pardon themself. It may also make an appeal less likely. In short, it may be the best way to make the conviction stick. Now, what good is a conviction if there's no punishment? The only thing I can think of that would have any impact on Trump is civil liability stemming from a criminal conviction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Itd be nice if he got to sentencing, said "PSYCHE! JAIL FOR YOU! FOUR YEARS! NO PAROLE!" and then had some cuffs slapped on him and dragged him directly to prison. It's not going to happen, but it'd be nice.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Rikers Island becoming the new seat of the American government wasn't something I had on my bingo card

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

“Sentencing”

Right.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’ve already said there will be no punishment, so why does this even matte? It’s almost like the news wants us to be angry.

I wonder why that is….

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lock him up before he takes office

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago

lol, good one

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why does Trump even give a shit at this point?

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He always wants to come out on top even if it doesn't matter. He can't help it: It's pathological in people who seek power.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

In other words, you don’t have to be an ax-wielding murderer to possess some of the classic psychopathic traits: lack of remorse and empathy, a sense of grandiosity, superficial charm, conning and manipulative behavior and refusal to take responsibility for one’s actions.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/research-suggests-politicians-are-more-likely-to-be-psychopaths-11364143/

Trump fits the description of a psychopath pretty well.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed. Also, He knows there aren’t any consequences so it reinforces his belief that this is a sham. This action also shows consistency on his defense's part.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn't a felony conviction make related civil suits against you much easier? I can think of a lot of people who would love to take a chunk out of his fortune.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dare say he is hoping to avoid another conviction

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Clown country

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago

Why bother? The sentence is going to be "Now, now, you shouldn't have done that!"

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

The judge plans to sentence Trump to an unconditional discharge, leaving him a convicted felon without further punishment.

Justice is dead.

load more comments
view more: next ›