this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

1814 readers
3 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea, whether the Lefty be Marxist, Anarchist, etc. no Lefty I have met has shied away from that label. Fascists love veiling themselves, however.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which is weird, because I'll regularly see two liberals screaming "Tankie!" at one another absolutely credulously

[–] swag_money@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

bitch I'm far ting

I'm personally an Anarcho-Syndicalist so yes :3

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

My views fall mainly under progressive, between liberal and far-left. I believe we should cap wealth at a billion dollars, and use the surplus capital for alternative energy infrastructure.

That’s far too progressive for liberals, yet I’m not on board with the “burn it all down and let a socialist utopia rise from the ashes” perspective of the far-left.

There are plenty of people on the left that hold non-centrist views, who would also not be considered far-left.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no "burn it all down and let a Socialist utopia rise from the ashes" perspective on the far-left, and I say that as a Marxist. Anarchists wish to build a new society out of the shell of the old, from within, while Marxists advocate building up dual power. In neither case do leftists believe in rising from "ashes," but building up and replacing the current system.

[–] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

too many misunderstand anarchy to be about destroying structures that exist. many of them are doing a pretty good job of that to themselves already, and the ones that are left would rather slaughter us than disarm. it's the final throes of a dying beast. too dangerous to throw more lives at, but nature will run its course eventually.

so we (anarchists) instead create structure to survive where we are, with the goal of directly helping people help each other, aiming to grow past existing power structures. it has been surprisingly possible to do a lot of praxis without even firebombing a second Chipotle

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“burn it all down and let a socialist utopia rise from the ashes” perspective of the far-left.

Yeah, I haven't really been able to make sense of all the tailism and accelerationism happening on .ml and hexbear. I don't know how we've gotten to the point where stanning a bunch of right winged authoritarian countries is a form of anti-imperialism.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Unlike anarchists, MLs don't really have a practical plan to get from the here and now to their socialist utopia. All they can do is wait for the collapse of the current society and hope that the subsequent radicalization will lead to them being the vanguard. However aside from the fact that vanguardism (and as an extension, ML) has been an abject failure, they can't cause that collapse, so they do accelerationism instead.

The only rational approach to change this world is anarchist prefiguration which is the opposite of "burn it all down".

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My main take on Tankies is that they're sort of stealth right-wingers.

They believe that the way to communism is through a strongman dictator who will enforce the communism from the top.

If you sub out communism for "social hierarchies" then you have the right-wing wet dream. Because Tankies worship Lenin, the man who betrayed the revolution to seize power after he lost an election. It was the first and last free election in Russia, and Lenin ignored the results because he lost. Then he spent the rest of his life pretending that an authoritarian dictatorship could ever be communist.

No, true communism needs to come from the people. Extreme democracy is the way.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Except this last election cycle American leftists actually said "I'm far left and everyone else is a nazi." Nobody was left enough for the left, even other leftists.