I'm no Sherlock Holmes, and I didn't read the article, but my deductions lead me to believe that she didn't want to give her money away, even though she was supposed to. So, that's the explanation..."I didn't want to give my money away".
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2026
438 points (99.1% liked)
politics
31892 readers
2353 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
she didn’t want to give her money away
Settling a monetary judgment against you is not giving you money away any more than serving time in prison to settle a criminal judgment against you is giving time in your life away.
Give to Caesar what is Caesar's. So pay Caesar already bitch.
That is the take I had back when it was first happening. She made a contract with the government that she would take a paycheck and do a function for them. She wasn’t personally condoning gayness, she was filing paperwork for continuity of ownership that happened to have both parties as male.
Once again, as the magic book says, fulfill the law. It says at least three times in the New Testament to obey the law, respect government, and pay taxes. If God thinks she was right, he could have shown up at court.
These people don't actually care about religion or the Bible though.
i'll give her a pass, if she was using the money to get a new haircut
Every single time I see her, I assume its a story about Mormons or the Bible Belt until my brain registers who it is.
I guess it kind of is.
It's been 11 years and she's still screwing them over
Davis, a conservative Christian who has been married four times, initially told the couple that she was acting “under God’s authority” when she refused to issue the license because she believes marriage is only between a man and a woman.
This was always the punchline to me. A Karen can be married four times and still think her opinion on the sanctity of marriage is worthy enough to dictate other people's ability to get married.
I mean, the hypocrisy is very christian, but it's always funny to see those details mentioned in the same sentence.
The Bible actually and very specifically condemned her remarrying. It actually never said two men can’t marry. Technically there is not a biblical problem with two men being legally married.
She hid them because she is a typical christen american. Married all those times and still thinks god always wants exactly what she wants.
Pra ba jeeba
She hid it because she was brainwashed that she's righteous and feels wronged by the courts. She claims to follow her chosen, invented supernatural laws, but ignores the ones she wants to. Hypocrisy is a huge part of the dualistic, supernatural systems with conditional belonging, to fit in the unhealthy tribes. She thinks she has the right to punch down on people the indoctrination says are lower than her. In her cult, gay men are lower than multi-divorced woman, apparently. Perhaps she doth protest too much and is Kinsey scale 1-6 herself, and resents all the people who enjoy their same-gender attractions, and who left the toxic, unhealthy systems behind, freed with the real truth.
Court gives Kim Davis four days to explain why she hid her assets
I can think of a few...
to avoid paying a gay couple $565K
Oh, so you already knew the answer.
"Your Honor, I hid my assets because that's a fuckload of money that I don't want taken from me."
Welp, you had every opportunity to stop acting like a cunt, and you failed Kim.
That would at least be partially honest, though the actual answer would probably contain at least two slurs.
I am generally against making fun of people for their looks which they cannot change. That said, this stupid bitch has butt-ugly hair and has chosen to have butt-ugly hair the entire duration of her stupid bitch infamy. That is over a decade of a hairstyle that, as I type this out, I am led to believe is worn that way to continue to offend the gays. She could pick any new hair style from The Undertaker's Deadman or Return of the Deadman eras. Hair looking like it does is a choice she makes.
she so ugly she'd make a train take a dirt road.
Why does she look like someone pulled her straight out of a Beavis and Butthead episode?
Because she's from Kentucky.
Good ol’ family ladder.
Because evil shows on your face
This seems like a dangerous statement. See physiognomy.
If a person has ugly thoughts, it begins to show on the face. And when that person has ugly thoughts every day, every week, every year, the face gets uglier and uglier until you can hardly bear to look at it.
A person who has good thoughts cannot ever be ugly. You can have a wonky nose and a crooked mouth and a double chin and stick-out teeth, but if you have good thoughts they will shine out of your face like sunbeams and you will always look lovely.
Roald Dahl, The Twits
I don't mean to imply that you should judge people based on their face, never do that.
Ok, sometimes do that.
the more you find out about him the more evil he looks.
Christ man give me a trigger warning
I’m really looking forward to her assets getting liquidated and the couple she’s persecuting finally enjoying the payday. She’s gonna be mad af and I’m gonna be happy as can be.
My favorite joke
I was about to ask how in the world a Kentucky clerk of the court could have enough to pay a half million settlement, but inheritance, I guess makes sense.
You'll find the answer to your question "Why did she hide her assets to avoid paying gay couple?" within the question.... To avoid paying gay couple
What can I say other than lol.
The question is the answer
I cannot wait for the court to take her assets. What an evil hypocrite 'christian'. May she burn in the hell she believes in. I hope she is homeless for decades up until her death.
Every time I see her name I think of that stupid Kim Carnes song
I think your link is broken, it just directs to a fucking awesome Kim Carnea Song ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Sorry I just don't like overplayed songs, no matter how good they are.
view more: next ›