this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026
8 points (72.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

50231 readers
708 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a challenge, can you distinguish which character set/s belongs to Japanese & Mandarin?

There are of course differences between Kanji / Hanzi but the "difficult" part is knowing which language is which simply by glancing (unless you know either 日本語 or 中文 that is).

2M3gN5HWTHpDZ7q.png

byPxaFmNp53ImDy.png

In contrast, do you know any words that are near identical when written down between two "alphabetical" languages based on their spelling?

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grillgamesh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)
  1. CN/JP aren't alphabets.(excepting hiragana and katakana) they're a logographic language, much like the Egyptian Hieroglyphs.

  2. JP's kanji stole something like 95% of its characters from CN. the only real way to tell at a glance if a sentence is JP or CN is by looking for hiragana or katakana in the sentence, as JP usually has a few of them per sentence, while CN does not.

hope this helps your linguistic endeavours! :)

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The kana aren't alphabets either. They're syllabaries. The closest they get to alphabetic are the characters that represent the single vowel sounds, A, I, O, E, U... aaand N for some reason, but those are very restricted in how and where they're allowed to be used.

[–] grillgamesh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

huh, the more you know.

I've always called them alphabets because of their phentic similarity to abcde/etc as each character represents one sound.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

Alphabets are finer grained. Every alphabetic letter is either a consonant or vowel. Sometimes a letter can be one or the other depending on the specific language and context, but nonetheless, consonant or vowel.

Syllabaries pack two or more of these into a single character. Most of the kana are consonant-vowel pairings, with the exception of the six I mentioned previously, and as a result you can end up with a lot more symbols than a pure alphabet would need.

You can also go the other way into abjads, which generally only write consonants. Vowels take the form of optional marks on those consonants. Hebrew and Arabic are the best known examples of these. And you'd be less inaccurate to call those alphabets to be fair.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Worth noting that while something like 95% taken from Chinese it was taken from traditional Chinese and then underwent it's own simplification process independently from Chinese. This leads to a lot of subtle and sometimes huge differences between some related kanji and hanzi.

[–] glasratz@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago

But Egyptian Hieroglyphs aren't a logographic system. They have logographic elements as well as alphabetic, syllabic and ideographic.

[–] phr@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago

plus: sinojapanese characters often have distinct forms from their siblings in simplified or traditional japanese. so it's possible to tell which is which without the presence of kana

[–] Anachu@leminal.space 20 points 4 days ago

I can tell, but that's because I can read both. Someone who's never learnt either language probably can't tell the difference between the sinographs, but could distinguish the language based on presence of hiragana, which are distinctly rounder and less dense

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In contrast, do you know any words that are near identical when written down between two "alphabetical" languages based on their spelling?

Yes.

Idiot (English) Idiot (m) Idiote (f, French) Idiot (m) Idiotin (f, German)

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes, also a lot of words ending in -tion exist in German, English, and French (though in German they are capitalized because they are nouns). For example "information" or "nation".

If near identical counts too, it's even easier because most of these same words exist in Italian with the ending -zione, Spanish with -ción, etc.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As someone who cannot read either language, I normally go by the rule of thumb that if it has a lot of curves it is probably Japanese, otherwise I assume it is Chinese. If we can throw Korean into the mix then I just need to see one circle and that's how I determine if it is or not. It's not a perfect system, but I would surmise that I can guess the language well above half of the time.

Also aren't the characters for Chinese shared across all spoken versions, if so, why did you specify Mandarin instead of just saying Chinese?

[–] scallisto@retrofed.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In Hong Kong, Macau (both speak majorly Cantonese), and Taiwan (mostly speaking their own flavour of Mandarin, Hokkien, and a few other ones too depending on where you are), they use traditional Chinese characters while the mainland PRC (huge pot of all sorts of dialects and other bits, but Mandarin is the standard language) is simplified, and somebody who knows one is not always able to read the other.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago

On these charts, no idea.

In real texts, it's not that hard because Japanese text usually has kana in it. I can't read kana, but I can recognize some of them as being kana, even if I don't know what syllables they represent.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago

No because it is too small and my eyes aren't that good anymore :)

[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My guessTop is 日本語 bottom is Mandarin

[–] animemann80@feddit.online 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's actually by column rather than row in both images. Like this:

spoiler

7XBXGIJO8cmXCKF.png

  • The Green Column is written in Japanese
  • The Blue Column is in Chinese (Traditional)

I only have the first image referenced, but the same principle applies on the second.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

That's why it was so confusing!

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I can, only because I have a passing familiarity with both. I could also spot Korean characters if I saw them. although I cannot read Japanese or Mandarin or Korean, there is a definite stylistic difference between the characters and how they are represented.

I can typically tell with Western languages as well. But, again, only because I have a passing familiarity with many of them.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

Pretty sure weeb is the same in all languages

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 1 points 3 days ago

I can tell the difference, at least with simplified hanzi vs kanji, most of the time. When I was in Japanese language school, a lot of Chinese students would end up with small mistakes in Japanese as there are some other fairly minor writing differences. I can't remember if it was that Japan was more strict or the writing was taught slightly differently.

Across language, there are some fun coincidences in completely unrelated languages that have words that mean (nearly) the same thing with (nearly) the same spelling, though of course I can't conjure one from the depths of my not-yet-awake brain; I'm sure wikipedia or something. I think 'Interlingual homograph' is the term related to those. I still like Japanese letter (手紙 lit. hand paper) -> Chinese toilet paper and other fun ones in non-alphabetical scripts.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I'm leaning towards the first one being Japanese and the second is Chinese.

Just based on hunch, I have no experience with either.

[–] phr@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

it's a list of characters (from left to right: japanese forms and traditional chinese forms). i can't tell fot all characters but it seems to be true for those i know. (?)

i don't speak any of these languages but i dabbled with learning to write ..

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I wanna say 1 is japanese and 2 is chinese, based purely on which seems more complex and swishy.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

First one is weird, therefore Chinese.