FriendOfDeSoto

Apple was the first big aggregator with then iTunes. Spotify is the biggest streamer that also hosts podcasts. I suppose it helped highlighting the ease of subscribing through these services to get subscribers.

I absolutely hate this triad of "you can find us on [insert propriatory source like Spotify], Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts." The last third includes the two preceding ones. Both Spotify or Apple are places where one can find podcasts. It is illogical to say it like that and I find it annoying. I don't think it is necessary to remind people any more how podcasts work in 2025. They will find you. Stop giving free ads to other services. Especially services that have proven to be hostile to the open RSS architecture, like Spotify.

I don't think this is genetic though. Critical thinking is something you should learn how to do. It's a failure due to chronic underfunding in education.

I do agree with you that the people who can do it, often despair and withdraw from public discourse out of frustration. But they could be making babies like rabbits at the same time.

Can we please stop paying attention to what this Nazi saluting man baby is saying?

Die Franzmänner fressen auch Schnecken. Warum nicht also eine schöne, saftige Fliege zum Milchkaffee? Dazu eine leckere Gitanes ohne Filter. Hmm.

I think it would be fair to highlight that this was revolutionary France' brainchild. It is a republic today as well but they've gone back and forth on that one a bit in the last two centuries.

God is surprisingly versatile in the good book. Old testament god is totally judgy and throws a plague of locusts at you. Or a flood if you wear the wrong fabric or something like that. Hissy fits to the hilt.

New testament, so Jesus-story god is more chill. He only kills his own son to make a point. Father of the year material.

Now, a lot of this stuff is open to interpretation. One might argue I have interpreted stuff in the preceding two paragraphs as well. I wouldn't argue against that and I'm not going to get drawn into a biblical discussion because I really don't care. I am a lapsed Lutheran protestant and the Jesus they tried to teach me about wouldn't have given a fuck about your sexuality. So if fake LLM Jesus says you do your thing, it ain't my biz who you love, I'm at least inclined to believe it was programmed with a similar interpretation of the story. And while the idea of a Jesus, Mary, and God LLM chat bot is absolutely, undeniably, ridiculously ludicrous, it is almost reassuring that there must be enough training material out there to get it to give that serene a reply.

To be fair to the former PM and author, all of these points are touched upon one way or another in the article and so-called AI is merely another layer of threat to the existence of such a small language community. She didn't consider Icelandic safe before the models popped up and just now got worried. And while it's probably too early to have scientific proof about the influence of models to back up her argument, I don't think it's nonsense to think that way. And I think the guardian headline is misleading.

Note this is not a final ruling yet and can and probably will be appealed.

That's a matter of opinion. I suspect a big university like that quickly spends its budget and does way more than compile a dictionary. And if spelling is all you need, that still appears to be possible in front of the paywall.

For the longest time, it wasn't free of charge. You had to buy expensive books. I fail to see a justification for the outrage. Also considering that this thread is rife with suggestions for alternatives and more dodgy solutions.

It's a funny coincidence of history that gated communities for the well off folks in capitalism and mass housing for the not well off in communism follow the same design principle: few access points that can be controlled by a single tank each.

They aren't under any obligation to provide the fruit of their labour free of charge.

As far as I can see their subscription prices have also only gone up over the years. Why? Do you think a Mr Burns like figure is sitting behind the scenes asking Smithers to relese the hounds? Or because running the linguistic operation, the database, and a website that people all over the world look at as the de facto authority of the language and gets queried thousands of times per day just cost shitloads of money? And they no longer get enough funding another way?

Did they ever put ads on their website? Do you run uBlock or similar plugins on your browser?

Is it possible? Yes. You can see examples in mainland China where foreign channels, including the more liberal channels from Hong Kong, routinely get blacked out when China news come on (unless they are gloriously positive).

Is it likely where you are? No. Especially it happening on broadcast channels you would hear a lot more about it. The socials would be full of it. There would have to be an office full of people censoring broadcast channels as they go out. We know the Chinese are operating such a facility because we heard about it. And we haven't heard anything like that for the US. Ockham's razor points at a buffering issue somewhere along the distribution chain from the news studio to your local antenna. A streaming video, like on YouTube, is just freeze framed when it's buffering also. And I don't think you as an individual consumer are important enough for somebody just doing it for your receiver.