this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
209 points (97.7% liked)

RetroGaming

27606 readers
85 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you own either game already, you’ll get it for free.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Here's a grey lining I saw on tumblr:

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except this new release doesn’t erase the existing game, and doesn’t prevent people from continuing to make mods however they want.

It’s a new version with new features and content, and they’re even giving it to existing owners for free, but people still find a way to complain.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 10 points 2 years ago

The original MS-DOS versions are still directly playable too.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's a weird take from someone kind of uninformed. The assumption that the company would base the release off of the GPL'd version and not the original source code is odd. Also, the claim that it's Windows only when it's cross platform so....?

[–] ygpa@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

One of her points that resonated with me was that to get modern levels to work they did have to re-implement Boom features, which were GPL.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Looks like it's a different engine, actually. So yeah, makes sense that if they needed to reimplement features, it's new code that wasn't pulled from Boom, so doesn't need to be GPL.

[–] ygpa@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah it's a port to Nightdive's Kex engine. It wasn't a literal accusation of a GPL violation, more just being disappointed about seeing open source work being captured into proprietary software.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

My main takeaway is that the original Dooms owe much of their cultural relevance to work done by the community for free, under the open source ethos.

And then there's the creative work done using those tools: thousands of hours worth of megawads, total conversions, one offs, and weird little experiments - that have been responsible for keeping Doom actually relevant.

For decades, nothing new happened with Doom 1, 2, or 64, that wasn't authored by us, and for free. The retro dooms weren't exactly abandonware, but for all intents and purposes the franchise has been community run. Yeah you buy the official IWADs from their license holders, but that was the extent of it.

Yes they have the legal right to charge for this work, but like, it's not the coolest move given all the history.

EDIT oh wait I read on a bit - it's free? That changes things. Definitely wish it was more open, but at least it's not a cash grab

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a whole new port of the game given away freely to those who had previously paid for the more recent ports.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ygpa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Saw a similar complaint on cohost (too long to fit in a screenshot) https://cohost.org/lexyeevee/post/7224213-empty

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the same person.

EDIT: Sorry, it was reposted by the same person as the above.

[–] ygpa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I just found it from her page, been following her for a while.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Given the fuckups around definitive editions and the fact that there's already so many great, free, open source Doom engines and content, this feels like a money grab and a step backwards.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How is a free update now somehow a money grab? This is definitely not a step backwards. They even made a new episode.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

You know what, you're right, I may be too cynical.

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

The Quake rerelease still offers the classic GLquake

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 5 points 2 years ago

The games cost like $2 on Steam. They probably lost money doing this if anything especially since they gave it away free to people who bought the previous releases.

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It’s free and it’s not like Doom is a famously expensive series of games or anything; each entry is 5 quid at most unless it’s 2016 or Eternal.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I own both, but on a set of 3.5" floppies somewhere in my dad's basement. If they even still work... Doubt I'll be able to claim my copy somehow.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's an upgrade to the DOOM (1993) and DOOM II versions on Steam currently, which usually are only $2-3 each from what I remember.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 2 years ago

Seems like it's available on consoles too.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I was going to say the same thing - will they send me a floppy disk with the upgrade?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago

That would put me in a bit of a pickle, my last floppy drive went out of business sometime in the mid 2000's. As soon as bootable USB sticks for recovery became viable, don't exactly know when. But in my last 2 desktop computers I doubt I used the floppy drive once... Built them in mostly out of nostalgia. Or habit maybe.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They should!

But ONLY if you write them a handwritten letter and mail it to them!

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I've said it once and I'll say it again. Doom is the best game ever made.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

What if I want to keep the original version? Can I still access it? I'm getting sick and tired of my games being replaced with shit I never asked for, even if it is arguably a "better" version.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 17 points 2 years ago

When you launch, you get a prompt from Steam asking if you want to run this new rerelease or the original MS-DOS versions.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I read that it includes the original versions, which is something I'm also counting on.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 10 points 2 years ago

It's already out, checked my Steam library and both this and the original versions are there.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 2 years ago

If I was at home I could...

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

If you check the folders as well, all the .WADs are there for everything (if you want to use them with a different port/engine). Not sure if it detected which games I already owned, but my version is actually Doom + Doom 2 + Final Doom + Master Levels + Sigil + NRFTL + LOR (new campaign). Plus all the featured mods (from the recent console ports) and a regular user-driven mod browser.

It's a pretty overwhelming update to the already decent Kex engine port that's been on consoles for a while. They added a bunch of dvd-extras too like concept art and such. It's not my favorite way to play but it's still a pretty great free update!

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, you can access it; all the WADs are still there.

[–] Varyag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I have been having an absolute BLAST with this new version since yesterday. The news of this and the subseauent drop as a free update for the versions I already owned on GoG and on the Switch just made my whole week, where I was bumned by the Helldivers bullshit.

A solid new port by Nightdive, implementing most of the modern mapping techniques, able to run a LOT of custom content that was created over the past 30 years. Plus extra artworks, bonus IDKFA soubdtrack by Andrew Hulshult, addon downloads on all platforms (with user sent ones on the PC), and 16 player multiplayer?

This is now the immediate response to anyone who wants to get into Doom nowadays. No need to fiddle with sourceports or go chase obscure mods, they're ALL there. If you get more into Doom modding after that, you can go after all those things later. It's great!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

NICE! I may have to fire up Steam and check this out.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just tried the online multiplayer, jumped into a co-op game with someone else in Doom E1M1 and it slowly started filling with players and got both crowded and chaotic. 16 players running around a map is just insane fun.

[–] Procedure8295@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

I'm getting real Lan party vibes with the multiplayer, truly recommend it! 👏

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I tried it out for a bit. it's not bad at all, but there's a bunch of stuff in there that doesn't gel with me personally. I had to turn the crosshair off because it was too high on the screen, and the autoaim was causing me to miss shots due to height differences. It's neat enough and I'm sure it's a great option for consoles, but I'll stick to gzdoom myself.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I disabled the crosshair. Autoaim has always been part of Doom though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

A new episode looks sick! It's an amazing what they do with a freakin' 30-year old game! I love seeing stuff like this.

[–] SilentObserver@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sweet! I haven’t played classic DOOM is quite some time. So this will be fun to check out since it’s already on my GOG.

Maybe I’ll check it out along with Selaco this weekend.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What prompted this - did they find a machine that wouldn't run it??

(Im joking, not really asking)

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They wanted to make it closed source again

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 1 points 2 years ago

It's a whole new engine not based on the open sourced version so... yeah, they can do that.

[–] turbodrooler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Next up, Pac-Man-as-a-Service

load more comments
view more: next ›