I never said nor I implied that. The point made during the trial was that the people were observed to be intimate and drunk, so whatever happened next was at least not premeditated.
Yes. There is a due process that needs to be observed, and exposing people just because you don't agree with the ruling is exactly the argument fascists and dictators bring to push their agenda and discredit the court of law.
You might also look further into this specific case, the article is very one-sided and meant to create outrage.
- The alleged perpetrator tried to bring the woman home but her roommate didn't open for over 30 min
- They've been making out in the bar and been observed holding hands and kissing by a cctv along the way
- Eventually they ended up in the guys house where they had sex, which she later said was nonconsensual, which is very much possible. However, witnesses say the guy was also drunk beyond being able to reasonably give consent.
- He was given a suspended 3 year sentence, not a free pass.
No. Keep that shit practice in the US.
Yeah but isn't that the place to buy food? If foot traffic is down it means people buy their essentials elsewhere.
I mean, do the maths. A high res picture is 8-15 MB in size, and a 4k video has 60 fps (frames per second). Let's take 12 MB as average picture size, that gives you 12MB x 60 frames x 60 seconds = 43.2 GB/min. With some advanced compression algorithms you can maybe get the individual frame size down to half, but that's really it.
Frustrates me as well, but the reason is quite simple that people search for "$device cable", and sellers need to list all of them so the search engine of choice lands the user there.
They should still list the specs though.
I don't know who that is, and I do know happy parents. So, as childfree as I am, I disagree with this statement.
Chat is only available in the official client, the implementation is closed source. So yeah most likely that.
So you go back to your negative review, edit it, and insert a random space somewhere. Did just that.
The investors have a seat in the board of directors in xAI, and for a shareholder deal you must have board approval. So at least more than 50% of the directors support this, meanings he is legally in the clear.
Very good point, I didn't really consider that. And now I feel bad for not replying more to your elaborate response, but there's simply nothing else I could add.
I can't switch to Linux due to software requirements for work. On my personal computer I'm using Xubuntu for well over a decade, I didn't like the unity window manager of Ubuntu. I heard they changed to something else by now, but I can't be bothered to switch.