this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
103 points (64.0% liked)

Political Memes

2694 readers
399 users here now

Non political memes: !memes@sopuli.xyz

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 101 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I see we are ramping up the anti voting memes up ahead of the American election, comrades.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

'Tis the season, after all. The leaves're changing, time to prime the plebs.

[–] crispbacon99@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Democrats not turning out in 2024 IS what got trump and the GOP into majority power in all branches of government. Now they wanna make sure you don't come out so the dictatorship can finish its installation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fourtonetiger@lemmy.ca 88 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Do both. Vote and rebel. Hit all fronts.

[–] MediumGray@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly! Why so many people seem to think you can't do both is bizarre to me. Makes you wonder if they're actually arguing in good faith or not.

[–] cosmos8188@leminal.space 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I sometimes wonder if the majority on Lemmy are here solely for arguments.

I've found that a lot of reddit users recently migrated to Lemmy and brought their bad faith with them. As well just generally acting like dipshits.

[–] crispbacon99@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

There's legitimate money and special interests to sway the election. Whether that's with bots or paying for troll farms to post propaganda

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well many here are just rejected redditer so....

(me included btw))

[–] cosmos8188@leminal.space 18 points 3 weeks ago

This is the most sane answer here - fighting one war while letting them win the other isn't wise. Doing both and securing all the fronts is how we win.

And we certainly dont win by calling each other dipshits - unless your mission is to dismantle the left.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

See I support this, it's the people who think voting by itself will suddenly fix everything that I think are delusional.

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, it sucked when they had to invade to get Orban out of office....

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 62 points 3 weeks ago

You cant generally vote fascists out once they've sufficiently subverted or removed democratic processes, but they can be voted in especially if they're the ones motivated to actually do so, their efforts to subvert those processes take a variable amount of time to complete that sometimes means they're not totally done by the next election cycle, and even in the case of rigged/subverted elections, its not like they'll suddenly become more fascist if people vote against them but won't if people don't do that.

It's also not like voting, when possible, takes away a person's ability to also try anything else. So, unless you have good reason to believe that a given election is actively dangerous, like that they're only holding it to learn who would vote against them given the option or something like that, it makes sense to participate if the option exists.

Worst case, the election is meaningless and one wastes a small amount of time in trying it. Best case, you overestimated how much the process had already been subverted and the election system proves to be still functional. In neither case does casting a vote against someone that seems to be a fascist or similar make them more likely to succeed than if you'd simply stayed home.

If people voting against them did benefit fascists, they wouldn't spend so much effort on undermining elections and voter intimidation, it would be counterproductive.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 44 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm seeing a weird amount of anti-voting posts 2 months before an extremely consequential midterm that's very likely to shift the balance in Congress unless an incredible amount of voter suppression occurs (and oh look, lots of sketchy voter suppression is going on, plus it would be very inexpensive to spin up some social media campaigns to try to discourage voting)

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yup! just keep spreading anti-voting propaganda! THAT'LL DEFINITELY HELP

Why vote for better leaders when you can just doomscroll and pretend you're daddy's special lil anarchist boy that understands everything so fucking perfectly!

jog on, prick

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Anarchist spreading shit to enable fascism and feel justified while everyone suffers.

Fuck off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

[image of billions of dead bodies of innocent people with dipshit 22 year olds cheering that they've solved everything]

This is how tankies think socialism works.

[–] OldCrow@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

This is how decades of underfunded education looks. This is not by accident.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hitler was appointed by Hindenburg

[–] Raylon@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

After the NSDAP got a third of the seats in parliament in 1932.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

True, but my point was that Hitler was not elected by any democratic process

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wasn't it standard practice to appoint someone from the winning party?

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Perhaps it was. However, Hitler wasn’t a member of the opposition party in 1932/3

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm gonna be real I don't know enough about german history to participate in this debate, gg

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Much better than pretending that you know what you’re talking about and acting like an asshole

Fr fr

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

As far as I know, he was voted in. So get the fuck out with this bullshit of yours

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 weeks ago

Hitler was voted into power.

So he would never have been elected with enough counter votes.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How is the colour of the skin a political view? Racists are pretty confused people it seems.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I've honestly come to the conclusion that white communists, at least the ones online, believe most nonwhite people are radicalized.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The voting is part of it yes?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

yeah I don't get the hate. I never interpret these as "voting doesn't matter, don't do it". but I guess that's not common, in which case, fair

vote, but execute [action ]as well

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Just a reminder that troll factories manipulate from both sides of the political spectrum: they try to play to disenfranchise effective opposition from the groups they know they won't convince while they promote support for their own candidates from the groups they know they have their support.

Just because Lemmy is not mainstream does not mean it isn't replete with special interests. In a way it makes it more vulnerable to certain types of it.

[–] DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

You're finished Adolph...

[–] Themosthighstrange@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

This Lemmy ad paid for republicans to support centrists so fewer people vote committee

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Umm this isnt limited to white people. Don’t be racist.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s not limited to “facts“, either, so…

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Its worked for over 100 years though. It just doesn't work in all circumstances.

load more comments
view more: next ›