MediumGray

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Because you commented on the post directly rather than replying to another comment? Do you think top level means it got upvoted or something?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Ya, I'd almost liken minesweeper as more of a meditation than a game. That being said I do genuinely enjoy it as that; as a flowchart that's simple enough that I should always get it right but complex enough that I do still have to pay attention. It's good for resetting my focus.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Man, that guy does not know how to fell a tree

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Pretty sure they meant to reply to another image in the thread here but messed it up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I mean, the sea is hardly the same colour as the sky either (usually) and yet we still call both those blue so it's not all that different. Though I agree that it seems like starker difference to me I can acknowledge that's at least partially my own biases.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What I mean is that, lacking any other info, communist does not automatically equal authoritarian. There is a tragic amount of overlap between those two Ven diagram circles but it is not an intrinsic thing is all I'm pointing out. Of course I know nothing about the specifics of this situation in particular, and I'm not so arrogant as to talk as though I do. I'm just making a general point.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think this scenario highlights the difference between communists and tankies. Tankies are a subset of communists (or at least claim to be) but not all communists are tankies.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My understanding is that not saving window size and placement is a limitation of Wayland right now (for security reasons that it's trying to address rather than ignore like xorg I think?). I think it's something that's planned to be added eventually, but who knows when that might be. It is frustrating in the meantime I agree.

Take all this with a large grain of salt of course, I am by no means an expert on the matter and am just repeating what I read when I looked into it myself a year ago or so.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, if taking it seriously, then those are reasonable conclusions. However, I think you're just overthinking it, in this context the scenario exists to service the joke rather than the other way around.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The comedic implication is that the giant eagles are natural predators of goblins and, more importantly, hobbits. And might be inclined to a mid-flight snack.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Well, we know that they're typically referred to as male (as far as I know at least), so perhaps they're all transmasc?

view more: next ›