In my opinion, this will only hurt Christianity, so I'm all for it.
There's no better way to produce atheists than reading the Bible, Koran, and/or Tanakh, exposure only helps secular society.
Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.
The following things are not grounds for murder:
Rules:
In my opinion, this will only hurt Christianity, so I'm all for it.
There's no better way to produce atheists than reading the Bible, Koran, and/or Tanakh, exposure only helps secular society.
They'd only read about the bible. Probably watch prageru videos, actually.
Yes, just like any church, only select parts are will be presented.
However, if they're anything like me, or even the least bit inquisitive, they'll be curious about the rest and read it. Then, they will learn the awful truth.
should have been put to death at least a hundred times by now according to the bible.
if anyone should ever need proof that religion is absolute bullshit, look no further than him and his friends.
What you really need is civics classes so people actually learn how your system works
My civics class was taught by a conservative who complained about illegal immigrates, unions, and welfare queens. Also praised Disney for gentrifying Time Square.
it's about time for the Americans to learn who is really their king
... Charles?
Doesn't matter who our king is, they bow down to the Whore of Babylon.
Death for adultery? I’d like to think we’re more evolved than biblical law these days. For instance, I think he should be put to death for all the child rape but that’s just me.
We can put him to death for many things. No need to limit ourselves.
We can also innovate! For instance, he should receive every death sentence at once.
Reading the bible is an easy path to atheism
"Studying", sadly, isn't reading. But the eventual lawsuit about requiring Quran study will be fun. Not to mention when the church of satan steps in.
The SCOTUS will be like: "The founding fathers came to America to be slave-holding bigots, we're not going to disrespect this by teaching other religions"
Clarence Thomas would vote for that.
You don't even need slavery to buy me
Clarence Thomas, probably
As with everything else constricting, "religion for thee, not for me."
According to the Bible he's the damn antichrist
Wait i thought Obama was the antichrist?
So many damn antichrists, they're like rats.
There's an antichrist for every antipope.
Only to the ignorant racists.... but to the racists Obama was anti everything because he kinda proved their whole supremacy stichk is bullshit
I've legit heard this sentiment irl. Between qanon and Left Behind we lost a lot of folks to conspiracy.
And let's not forget sloth, gluttony, wrath, envy, vanity and pride.
Vanity and pride are the same sin, you forgot lust and greed.
are the seven sins in the bible?
quick search suggests not
I mean, they aren't literally listed out, but they are scattered through the bible verses, see here for example. I honestly think the fact that they are scattered across books buried in paragraphs of text kinda supports your argument tho.
The tiny little rural town I was raised in as a kid had a dog food factory, an itty bitty post office not much bigger than a port 'o potty, and an old shut down gas station. I think the town and surrounding area had a population of 300 or 500 (this was back in the 90s). It also had 10 churches (maybe more) all lined up along the bypass highway that went through "downtown".
40 years later, as of last time I've been through, nothing's really changed.
I only say this because I feel like kids already had plenty of options to study the Bible? Like half those churches did some kind of service 7 days a week, and on some days, multiple services. Services including Sunday School and Bible Study.
Trump never cared for religion until he realised he can use it as a tool for oppression