SarahValentine

joined 1 month ago

I have no idea why you're trying so hard to talk about anything except the literal actual thing we're talking about. This conversation is over.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

Well yeah, that goes without saying.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It depends on how you say it. I haven't gotten any bad reactions yet. One lady was surprised and delighted to be addressed with dignity for a change.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The discrimination is on the basis of race. That doesn't make it right, that doesn't mean that's the actual reason they're doing it in their minds. You're adding unnecessary context to the base word instead of adding the appropriate expansions to the base word to make it fit the desired context.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You just love moving those goalposts so you can keep having a leg to stand on.

I don't love you doing it. Ta-ta.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

"let's look at racism"

brings up historic examples of systemic, institutionalized racism, omitting every single personal act of racism in history

You expect me to take this seriously as a rebuttal?

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Because it's not powerism, it's racism.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 0 points 2 days ago

Yep you're lost bud. No idea what you're talking about.

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's great! You should definitely go say that in the thread about it!

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Normalize calling women "madame"!

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

You are literally in the wrong thread. This isn't the "maga hates libraries again" thread.

view more: next ›