this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
650 points (97.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

42053 readers
3475 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The visitors center was built for the crater good

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The second most being the pixels.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sorry about that. You don't like Sergeant Brick-Angel?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Was he in a Japanese porn?

(It seems obvious, but I’m not sure he has enough hair.)

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You can tell from what he hasn't got. A GREAT BIG BUSHY BEARD

[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I went there IRL!!! It was cool

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I went there, but they wanted to charge like 40 bucks a person to see the crater, so we left.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I find it incredibly weird that we, as people, respect it when someone says "That crater created by tons of falling space stuff many millions of years ago, is mine! No one can look at it, unless you pay me!". I mean, wtf? How does that make sense? What asswipe sold that crater at some point in history, and what gave them the fucking right?

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't the concept of land ownership already weird enough?

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I can follow the idea of owning a piece of land, where other people can't just be. Somewhere where people can't just take things from, or alter by cutting down a tree f.eks.

But owning land in order to keep people away from it, with the only purpose being to make people pay to view the piece of land is crossing the line.

I don't know where the line exactly is, but it's somewhere between having a place you live or a place where you use the land for a direct benefitial purpose for the community, however large or small, and keeping people away from a piece of land with the purpose of manufacturing scarcity in order to get paid to allow people on said land, without an actual beneficial purpose for the community.

The community would have a lot more benefit from the crater, if the person didn't keep people away from it for no other reason than greed. The same can't (at least not always) be said about a farm, or your livingroom.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Why can't the same be said about a farm? The only value in a crater of this sort is spectacle and maybe it is interesting from a geological history standpoint. But every piece of land must have its own geological history and I love seeing farms. So what does that mean for land ownership? I personally find the arrogance of man to be interesting and weird at the same time. "Look, we carved up the place that created us and decided we'll trade them." It's simultaneously very animalistic like how big cats have territories and also uniquely awfully engineered just for mankind.

The community would have a lot more benefit from the crater

I mean, someone has to own it. The community? But who in the community? An organization? The local government? Then, what if they charge money? This kinda situation is unavoidable. I'm not saying it should be abolished, I just find it interesting.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

In this case the land that contains the crater is valuable because it is uniquely fascinating to visitors, so I would treat it like a national park. It makes sense to reserve it as an exceptional public resource even granting private land ownership as a general practice.

[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

That's a long drive to turn around. The museum and visitors center was more interesting than the Crater.

It was very gusty winds when I visited, so only a brief time outside observing the Crater. There was a large hunk of meteorite inside, an educational lecture, and a museum. It was one of the highlights of my trip but it's not for everyone.

I recall someone else turning around and saying it was too expensive when I was purchasing my tickets.

The drive was so gusty that the wind was pushing the car while I was driving it. What a day to remember!

[–] M137@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Is the (w)hole damn thing surrounded by a fence?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure if it's all fenced but the entire thing (including the road) is on private land, so walking around it is trespassing.

There's only 1 road going there and it ends at the visitor's center, and impact crater walls are higher than surrounding terrain, so unless you get past the visitor's center all you see is a hill.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's a bit steep.

Like, I never went there, and just saw the crater for free.

*Laughing Track*

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it not possible to pull over just short of the visitor center and see it from there? I guess you won’t really be able to see down into it?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The whole thing is on private land, including the road, so it just looks like a hill from anywhere you can get for free.

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It was real cool. I am figuratively agreeing but also literally agreeing. I spent a winter break in that area and the whole desert was covered in snow.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you manage to avoid the meteor impact?

[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

I did! But apparently many others fell into the Crater and got stuck.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Did you see the spaceman?

[–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

you could say that their luck has been.. cratered

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine working at the visitor center when no one's coming, then one day you have a massive meteor impact and suddenly have something worth visiting in the vicinity of your visitor center

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

So does the rock itself disintegrate on impact or is it under the crater?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Fun fact a rich guy once bought the mining rights to a meteorite impact crater believing that it would be an easy source of pure iron to mine since most meteorites are primarily iron, but after digging for hundreds of feet and finding no iron the project ran out of money and went bust, because meteorites disintegrate into first a liquid iron, which then oxidised very rapidly and becomes dust and small chunks which settle in an ejecta pattern around the impact zone, sometimes many miles wide, and this thin layer is fairly quickly eroded away, so there's no usable iron nor a meaningful amount of oxide remaining.

Smaller meteorites often land intact, as their surface area allows for meaningful atmospheric friction to slow them down, and these are chunks of iron, but larger than about the size of a large van, the meteorite is usually obliterated.

Entry angle can allow for exceptions, IE if a meteorite just grazes the atmosphere but still slows down enough to suborbital speeds, it can land as big chunks, but even these get scattered over hundreds of kilometres. Any impact steeper than about 20 degrees and larger than a large van is usually carrying so much momentum at ground level that it hits at several, and possibly tens of kilometres per second, which liquifies and scatters it widely.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

That was a fun a fact.

[–] SpecialSetOfSieves@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

most meteorites are primarily iron

I have to note that this is not correct. Chondrites make up the vast majority of meteorites, and even the most iron-rich chondrites contain much less than 50% iron by weight.

I haven't been to Barringer Crater and I don't know all the sweet, gory details of the big bolide that made it, but LPI seems to have a nice summary. The estimated 30 tons of meteoritic iron retrieved from the site certainly isn't very much, and I have heard a variant of Agent641's story before, so I'll refrain on commenting there.

I'm a little sad thinking about all that oxidized iron, though. On Luna that stuff gets reduced instead, so that the regolith is peppered with little spheres of iron. Of course, here, we don't get the little balls of iron, or much in the way of intact craters at all... damn it, we could use a few more.

Sighs Earth. For all the predators and the continent-busting rifts here, this place just isn't very hardcore sometimes.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder what would happen if a large one came in directly perpendicular to the ground at high speed (for a meteor). Like the atmosphere is really pretty thin and that trajectory would have the least exposure to it.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It probably wouldn't change the outcome much. Meteorites usually have a relative velocity to earth of 8-50 kilometres per second. At those speeds, it moves much faster than a ballistic missile, and those things haul ass. Whether entering at 25 degrees or 90, it would instantly turn the air to plasma and pass through the troposphere and hit the ground in just a few seconds.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not a craterologist but my understanding is an impact like this is going to chemically change the asteroid and the ground. So partly disentigrates and kinda becomes part of the ground (idk if that counts as under)

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's alright, we already got a craterologist's answer.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's basically like setting of a nuclear explosion at that site. A big one, getting close to the Tsar Bomba. Everything nearby including the meteor turns to plasma and vapor, and that creates a shockwave that blows out everything nearby not instantly vaporized.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

the impact velocity is so high that the kinetic energy is large enough that it instantly vaporizes the whole asteroid on impact.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

if the center was there, the impact wouldve still obliterated the buildings.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks for the big circle. Otherwise no one would get the joke.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] MasterNerd@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

Obviously the meteor was finely tuned to avoid hitting the visitor center

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yeah but now that poor visitor center is ruined. People went there to see the vast open desert, not some hole made by space garbage! I hope the government can bail them out

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Quick, somebody start a gofundme to get that rock launched back into space where it belongs!

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Please send any sand you can spare to the visitor center. Together we can fill that hole

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Correlation vs causation

[–] PixeIOrange@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] faizanyay@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago