this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
524 points (98.3% liked)

Work Reform

17488 readers
1993 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 6 points 8 hours ago

I used to work for a small digital strategy consultancy. All the senior consultants up were expert in pretty much everything digital marketing and did their own data manipulation and analysis. SEO, technical SEO, link building, paid search, paid ads, Facebork ads, Youtube ads, social listening, search research... you name it. New consultants sat with experts, learned from people who genuinely knew their shit. We were expensive compared to, eg. Accenture's off-shore teams, but our results were far stronger, and offered genuinely actionable insights (relevant to our clients' business strategies and goals), compared to Accenture's off-shore teams.

Then we got bought up. Quite apart from the devastation that wreaked upon our ops staff as we were 'integrated' into the larger company, we were instructed to start using AI for all data analysis. For efficiency. So, our junior consultants no longer did any of their own data aggregation, cleaning, manipulation, or analysis. They didn't understand the data. They just spewed out whatever the AI told them the data said. Which, admittedly, was quicker. But there was no insight beyond the fucking obvious.

And, one by one, all the experienced people left the company.

Including me.

What had been a company of experts became a small department of AI users who didn't understand what they were doing, or why, or what it meant.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Perspective from someone forced to use AI at work:

I am a software developer and I am "invited" to use AI to ship as fast as possible. I hate it with all of my heart, and you know why? Because before I could think of myself and use the time to create something, whereas now I have to spend the same amount of time to talk to a machine and I can't do anything while it works. If it doesn't understand I have to explain again. It's frustrating

[–] NerdInSuspenders@leminal.space 4 points 12 hours ago

Novel and entertaining the first time around. Rote and uninspired every time after.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who has always been interested in technology and it's development, I find AI fascinating.

As someone who has a brain and can see all of the negative impacts this technology is having and will have on the world, I find AI deeply saddening and scary.

Can we go back to the 90s?

In a world where people controled their own work and lived in community with each other, AI could have been one of the greatest technological advances of the last fifty years. In the current system where everyone is subordinated to a tiny class of economic dictators who own every technology and piece of infrastructure, AI mostly just serves to advance the interests of its owners.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago

53% disapproval is rookie numbers! We can do better, fellow people!

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We were told this in a recent dept meeting:

We are not talking about replacing you or me by AI, no no no. We are talking about acceleration. To accelerate and change our ways of working and this is mandatory — yes or yes. The colleague — it doesn't mean just this dept — that doesn't use AI for their daily work next year, won't be in this company. And we will check it. This is the message: won't be in this company. And i'm not talking because it's me who orders this. No, it's the strategy of the company.

I'm sooo motivated to be working there...

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

How do they quantify who is using it or not?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

They generally have a hook into the accounts the employees use to access the provider. So you can burn tokens and look 'productive' and have it have nothing to do with your work.

A lot of the early adopters have already figured out that measuring employee usage just ends with big AI bills and essentially zero assurance that the AI provider was used productively. Those folks discontinued things like leaderboards and review based on tokens consumed.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Token usage, maybe? Just set up an agent with computer use to go talk to another agent. Problem solved.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

You use your worker account to access The AI.

[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Makes you wonder how much they're getting for selling your data to train AI. Makes you wonder why you can't say training AI wasn't on my job description and if you're going to be adding AI Training into my caseload you should be paying me more. They're getting a kickback, you're getting more work and same pay and what are the AI Companies getting? More stable ways of removing you from the company.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

Repos moved from local infra to an "enterprise" github account a while back.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Management is sometimes 'true believer', and only after the bill comes do they decide that maybe their employees shouldn't burn as many tokens as possible anymore.

They all picture it like AI is a great things and their employees are just not tech savvy enough to appreciate it, so all they have to do is make everyone have a taste and obviously everyone will both love it and become amazingly effective. Turns out that people generally do have a decent impression, for better or for worse, and forced micro management of it doesn't boost morale nor productivity.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sounds like it's time to make whatever AI the company has subscribed to, waste a whole lot of tickets on random shit.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I thought about malicious compliance but I don't want the end-users to get a shitty product.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

The people you work for don’t care, don’t pick up that slack for them, they still won’t care.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

why not?

It is the company's product.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I’d just ask the AI if this (whatever project I’m working on) looks correct. Then take whatever feedback it gives, whether correct or not, apply it, save it, and ship it. Sounds like what they want, yes? Give it to them. Hahahah.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Every fucking month I go from thinking my job is okay to fucking hating it because the CEO and other executives at my company give me orders from AI, or new orders to use AI in some fantastically stupid and needles way.

FUCK AI.

And the data centers, meanwhile, are destroying the goddamn planet and making everything worse for innocent people who live near them.

FUCK. AI.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

If I ignore the datacenter buildout implications and the copyright implications, access to AI facilities might be somewhat useful sometimes. But having it crammed down my throat with management second guessing my assessments of what it does makes it just insufferable.

Also, other people's AI slop is a huge workload burden too. Even if I am measured and don't use it much, that doesn't spare me from the flood of crap from my colleagues...

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 94 points 1 day ago (19 children)

I hate AI with a passion.

For me AI represents a decline in cognitive ability.

In the past when I solved a problem, I actually learned something, and I felt great about that.

When using AI, I don't get the same satisfaction of having learned something.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

The way I see it, is that it's a great tool for people that already know their shit and don't want to bother writing the code for it. There are some other use cases which are nice, like updating documentation or helping with pull/merge requests.

But it sure isn't worth all the downsides we currently know of, with the way it's being implemented.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

the problem with ai isn’t the concept, wikipedia is great

the problem is it is not deterministic, often factually wrong and being used by the rich to steal workers pay

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's peculiar as a thing that acts the same whether it's right or wrong. That is a pretty big drawback when trying to use it for anything vaguely fact based. The fact that if you don't know yourself, it sounds credible either way, is super tricky. Particularly when managers that are used to gauging credibility without knowing the material come along. They are complete suckers for AI output since they don't have good ways to know better.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 hours ago

aka the bias confirmationer

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Exactly my company is heavily pushing for full agentic development and while that does save time a bit, it comes at a cost, for one I’m no longer getting the deeper understanding of the codebase that I would if I did the work myself, and secondly the number of PRs that AI pushes out creates a review bottleneck because people can’t keep up, but management doesn’t care, they’d rather you push something out fast and if it breaks things it’s your job on the line not the AI subscription.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] LeftReddit2@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I swear to god, as much as I used to be pro ai from like 2019 to 2023, AI has made my coworkers so fucking stupid. So many of them are like useless without AI now and I keep getting sideways looks when I say I don't use AI for my job.

I get it to some extent as I work IT, but come on! You can't even make a fucking email without CoPilot telling you what to say!? Use AI as in Actual Intelligence! It's found in that place between your ears, god damn it.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

You mean putting water on plants? Like from the toilet?

[–] chunk6235@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

Who doesn't love having a dumbass client tell you, the industry professional of 10-20 years and a senior member of their department, that they figured out the problem you've been working on for over a year, and the answer is ?

No joke, had TWO clients within a week send me slop telling me that ThEy TaLkEd WiTh ChAtGeMaUdE and basically tell me that to solve a issue with a specific vendor app that I really need to check the firewall for blocks for some operating system functions that aren't even in use.

Like fuck dude, read your own goddamned slop and use your Alleged Intelligence to see if it even sounds remotely applicable.....

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If it generated wealth that workers could share in, then they might like it. But it's not generating wealth for anyone.

[–] andho@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's probably burning more wealth than it creates anyway

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago

Check out the Better Offline podcast. You'll like it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

ngl though, AI told me the format that doctors typically ask questions in and I put everything that I wanted to say in that format in my head before I went to the appointment which was a neurologist and she said well you answered everything exactly how I was gonna say it and it was like the shortest appointment ever.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Sounds like this could have easily been done without AI, and if the doctor likes things going that well, emailing a questionaire ahead of the appointment would have been even better. Then instead of 'typical questions the doctor will ask' being close to what you get asked, you get exactly what that doctor wanted to ask.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

The socially awkward CEOs of these companies went out giggle farting about how AI was going to replace everyone. Everyone starting thinking about how that would mean nobody could eat because they see what’s happening in politics. Everyone decided to nope out of that.

If they had let their PR dept handle things everyone would be oblivious and happy right now.

Good thing they could not keep their mouths shut.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

"closer to the opposite" is a funny way of saying "the opposite"

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

AI has multiplied the workload and management is in psychosis

load more comments
view more: next ›