this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2026
287 points (99.7% liked)

News

39113 readers
2512 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A disruptive passenger was restrained with flexible handcuffs and duct-taped to a seat as his flight was diverted to make an emergency landing in Baltimore Thursday night, photos and video from other passengers showed.

Richard Olenick and Juan Mejia were more than halfway through the flight when a man two rows behind them in the first-class section started to become belligerent, Olenick said.

A flight attendant tried to control the situation but the man got increasingly agitated, started to hit the passenger next to him and then hit a woman who tried to intervene, Olenick said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

And they claim that they couldn't do anything about those idiots that started preaching and singing religious nonsense, and basically holding a Christian rock concert mid flight...

[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Hold up. I was thought by this community to use kinesthetic tape for this...

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Looks like they took his Burger King crown away.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

a racist AND a homophobe! what?! but also he might end up being fined as much as 40k for assualting passengers, so that's nice.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surely it's more than that. The airline had to essentially got an entire second plane for everyone.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

that's just the assault, and just from the airline he can face separate fines for everything else.

Don't forget he needs to pay for the tape too.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If he's in first class that's chump change for him. Must be nice being rich and facing no real consequences

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I only first class, but am not obscenely wealthy. I don't fly often, and I'm a big dude and find it more comfortable. If I'm spending 2 grand going on a vacation every 5 or 6 years, I can splurge an extra couple hundred so I don't spend the whole time dreading the trip back.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The rest of the passengers should get 30 unsupervised minutes in a room with him and whatever happens, happens. Gives them something to do while they get the other plane ready.

[–] timochka@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

US domestic first is hardly "stratospheric wealth" territory, anyone could afford that if they saved for it (which I really wouldn't recommend - paying over the odds for a bigger seat on a 3hr shitty 737 flight is how you ensure you'll never have enough money for real first-class travel...)

[–] porkloin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my experience almost nobody is paying for the first class seats, they’re all frequent flyers who get upgraded there because they have status with the airline they fly on lots for work/business.

[–] timochka@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Fair point; the only justifiable reason to actually pay for it is if it's a feeder for a long-haul first connection (many airlines don't sell mixed-class bookings easily.)

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You can also get upgraded for free. I've flown first many times, I've never paid for it.

He'll probably enjoy being banned from at least that airline.

And the 40k are not for assaulting passengers, that will come in top.

Besides criminal penalties, the agency can pursue fines of more than $43,000 against any passenger who “assaults, threatens, intimidates, or interferes with airline crew members.”

[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

Why are they blurring his face? Fuck that. You need to let people know who these idiots are.

Edit: Okay. I've been properly chastised. I'm not entirely swayed, but you all have given me pause and things to think on.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

was going to reply to @exlisper@lemmy.curiana.net but figure I will to you. Last protest we had a guy drive by. park. come back and he was trying to throw another guys sign over a fence. He put hands on the other guy so I tried to pull him away. Cops actually came pretty fast I think because they kinda monitor our protest. From what the guy was screaming me and another protester were basically debating on if he was mentally ill, drunk, or both. We came to the conclusion both as he smelled of alcohol but even then some of what he said sounded more crazy than drunk. Ultimately you had us and him and a bunch of police and their vehicles so drivers by were taking a lot of pictures and I imagine it went on social media more. So the guy basically upped the visibility of our protest as far as what he accomplished. That being said I think he was mentally ill but maga seems to have a lock on that demographic here.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 21 points 1 day ago

Because he could be mentally ill and should not be shamed for it?

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why? So people who live thousands of miles away can see a headline, dox them, then harass their family based on assumptions for years?

You have no idea why this happened, or what the situation around it is. You have no reason to judge and punish this person.

[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's fair. But when you're arrested on suspicion of committing a crime, your identity is made public. I guess I'm more wondering why this guy's name and image are withheld in this instance.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Which is where I am and where this happened and where the article is being published, sooo.... I guess my question still stands?

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

We do the stupid thing in case X, so why aren't we doing it in case Y?

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

well we do it here in America, so you know it's the right thing to do

...how's that going for you these days?

[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

On the list of things wrong here, I'm not sure "posting photo of what someone does in public" even ranks.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

That's part of the problem. You've come to accept so many small compromises on your rights that you have the situation that you have now.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Probably because the news service doesn't want to potentially get sued. The same reason they often use 'allegedly' when talking about people accused of crimes.

Also, though they do it here in the states, it's still wrong to release the names and images of people accused of crimes. People should not have their name and face plastered across the internet merely because they've been accused. Being accused of a crime is not the same as being convicted of a crime. Why should someone have their life potentially ruined because they are accused of something. Lots of people are wrongly accused and never convicted. We should at least wait until a conviction before publishing such information.

Name and shame. Actions have consequence.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If that’s really duct tape, I wonder how easily it comes off of those upholstered seats without ruining them.

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Remember kids. If she doesnt find you handsome she should at least find you handy.

Moves and shouldnt? Duct tape. Doesn't move and should? Wd-40

Loved red green growing up.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Come over here big boy and I'll find you a handy

[–] elvith@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Just another item on that rowdy's bill after the flight ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] inari@piefed.zip 17 points 1 day ago

Absolute man-child

[–] Kyrias@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First class ain't what it used to be.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

He moved all the way up to 0 class

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This won’t stop until countries start punishing airlines for letting these repeat offenders onto flights in the first place

I would bet good money that this asshole has done this before, probably many times

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

From what I know the airlines do enforce lifetime bans for things that endanger others or just plain terrify the crew.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago

I would bet good money that this asshole has done this before, probably many times

Well, probably not to the point of being taped to the seat and forcing an emergency landing, though. His earlier incidents were probably less severe...

Which brings up the question: just how offensive does one of these repeat offenders have to be before you ban them from flying forever? Where do you draw the line?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There is no indication is a repeat offence and the airline would have banned him, as they usually do.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There have been more than 1,160 unruly passenger incidents reported so far this year, according to the FAA.

Jesus. Maybe we should make air travel less accessible again.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or quit serving alcohol. 🤷‍♂️

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did I miss something? Where was alcohol mentioned?

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It wasn't mentioned in the article about this specific incident, but most times I read about a passenger getting arrested for disrupting a flight, they were drunk.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

They're projecting

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Gate attendants and ticket counter clerks should be incredibly rude to all passengers.

Any passengers who can't contain their temper through that are denied entry. And then tada -- no more angry motherfuckers on airplanes.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Jaun Mejia the baseball player who pitches for the Colorado Rockies?

Naah must be another Jaun.