this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
251 points (89.6% liked)

Brand New Sentence

401 readers
318 users here now

Showcasing the brazen and nouveau in English communication.

  1. Be cool to each other and follow the lemmy.today instance rules.
  2. Post title must be the sentence, or relevant portion of the sentence if it's very long.
  3. Link for context if possible.
  4. Tag NSFW where applicable.
  5. This instance has no rules against calls to violence, please don't report general wishes for violence. Direct implications of harm (i.e. I will shoot x person in the head) will be moderated at our discretion.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

With or without makeup she still isn't going to fuck you, Jeremy.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

So what about a guy with a sock stuffed in his pants? If a woman has sex with that guy, and his dick isn't as big as he advertised, is that sexual assault?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 47 points 3 days ago (3 children)

calling the woman a female is a telltale sign its an incel.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 60 points 3 days ago (12 children)

I am crazy or is she not way more attractive without the makeup?

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

My husband just said, "If you think the one on the right is not an attractive woman, maybe you're gay. Like, you should just be looking for dudes."

Maybe she's not your exact type, but surely we can all agree that she very much fits the bill for what a large majority of people would traditionally consider pretty.

I am personally not a fan of the highly-made-up trend, so I do think that she's more attractive without the makeup. But I also understand why people like wearing makeup, and it's her right to do it or not depending on her mood. I think anyone who can't tell that she's wearing makeup in the photo on the left is (a) lying or (b) a child.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Part of it is she's authentically smiling and joyful without the makeup instead of doing that forced neutral "Paris Hilton" kind of look with the make-up.

Turns out when people are happy and in a good mood they're more attractive. Who knew?

[–] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago

It's almost liberating to realize that beauty is not the same as attractiveness.

Someone can look below average, but have a shining, friendly personality that makes them attractive as hell!

No matter the gender, either- I'm not a particularly handsome man, but I can tell you that sparking joy works.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Attractiveness is subjective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

Not crazy.. She is way more attractive w/o the makeup.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Damn I hate it when I get seduced by women wearing makeup, it's the worst thing ever, I hope it doesn't happen this weekend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] architect@thelemmy.club 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

The makeup version looks hideous to me but that is my personal opinion. Very overdone.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

I think she looks even prettier in the right photo Idk what the problem is

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 11 points 3 days ago

For the uninformed: this is a direct response to a post saying that obtaining sex by deception is sexual assault. Which, y'know, it is.

No, makeup doesnt fucking count you unmitigated arsehole.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 3 days ago

This sums up my opinion of the manosphere...

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 163 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (13 children)

I prefer the look on the right… I don't really need women to look like a Star Trek character

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 67 points 5 days ago

99% of the time women look prettier without heavy makeup. That's just my opinion that nobody asked for though 🤷‍♀️

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

This is why I can't talk to most men for more than a minute.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Conservatives will show you two pictures of a conventionally attractive person looking conventionally attractive, and then caption it some bs like "the age of men has fallen."

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (15 children)

She looks way better without makeup

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

She looks good when she feels good, actually

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] someone@lemmy.today 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How can this be anything other than rage bait when the woman on the right is so pretty and the language is so gross and offensive?

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Sadly, people do believe this. These are the same assholes that go off on women for wearing bras and then expecting all tits to be naturally porn-star perky.

Their real goal, under the ragebait, is to create and then normalize an ‘ideal woman’ template that’s nigh-unattainable and then punish every woman who doesn’t fit the mold. A demand, if you will, that every woman perform and dress up just for their eyes, with a side effect of disenfranchising and controlling women as the cherry on top.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

female

Quick, someone post the Ferengi!

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what I'm doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 88 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As a victim of rape, I cannot put into words how insulting this is

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] levophed@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

What a wild way to say you've never been with a woman before

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 100 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Oh no! Shes beautiful naturally and yassed up!? The fucking horror! My steak, my steak is far too juicy. Oh this lobster! Waiter! Far too much butter!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 66 points 4 days ago (55 children)

This argument is stupid either way of course... But I find the picture on the right way more attractive.

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So you can't tell she's wearing a makeup?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 15 points 4 days ago

Menchildren are really experts at blaming women for anything and everything, including not understanding basics like "people look a bit different with make up, which is the point".

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So she looks great without makeup, what's the problem?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago

I greatly prefer her WITHOUT the make-up. I would talk to the girl on the right, I wouldn't bother with the one on the left.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 69 points 5 days ago (5 children)

If you look at the left one and can't tell, that's on you ...

Also, I hate current makeup trends. Uncanny valley type of shit

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 43 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That post is like some precision engineered engagement bait. There are multiple axes of conflict that ensnare people in the mood to argue or share their opinions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, it's not like they're reproducing. Just give it a few years.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

sadly it wont work like that

they wont have children and raise incels, but tw*tter will still raise incels from others' children

incelism is a social-media-borne disease to which people raised to be bigots are susceptible

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sadly, you're right. They reproduce asexually, like slime molds, and nuns.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 17 points 4 days ago (3 children)

"Doesn't disclose up front"?

If the guy can't tell that the left one isn't all natural, he seriously needs to get his eyes checked and stop playing games or watching movies that suggest otherwise.

To extend the tiniest bit of charity to him, those games and movies are part of the problem. Sure, some women like to feel pretty, but if every woman looks perfectly styled all the time in the middle of an apocalypse, their contouring and eye-shadow as immaculate when waking up as it was when they went to sleep with it, I can kinda get how someone who rarely interacts with women comes away with the impression that's what women typically look like.

Of course, "rarely interacts with women" is hardly a compliment (and using the term "females" sure isn't helping his case).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›