No Data = Stealth Corn
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
310 points (96.4% liked)
Map Enthusiasts
5437 readers
1 users here now
For the map enthused!
Rules:
-
post relevant content: interesting, informative, and/or pretty maps
-
be nice
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Honestly it fits my theory that one of the Dakotas doesn't really exist.
It's probably where all the birds are controlled from.
One of them certainly shouldn't exist. The fact that that area is split into two states is only to have two more Republican Senators.
State borders are strange. Like why the part of Florida in the central time zone isn't just Alabama doesn't make sense to me.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Could you imagine living in Hawaii and not having readily available corn fields? How would I do all my corn field based activities?
I was literally just thinking that we need more corn fields here
Get your shit together, Alaska!
Embarrassing
“No data“ it at that point
TIL most US corn is Republican
The second highest on this map, illinois, is a Dem state
To be fair, the corn isn’t growing in the blue part of Illinois
Yes it is. As a resident, I can attest that the corn is growing about damn near everywhere.
Never been to Chicagoland? Every empty field is filled in with corn. Smash a gas station flat? Now it's a cornfield.
Multiple counties in Illinois voted in favor of exploring secession from the state because they don't like how Chicago turns the state blue. It would definitely be a red state without us.
Every state would be a red state without the major cities.
Except Massachusetts apparently.
Yup, and Michigan and Wisconsin are swing states. It’s still the vast majority.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Hard to believe there is no data on corn fields in the home state of the Corn Palace.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This makes me wonder what the map creator considers a green amount of corn to be lol. 100%?
To be fair, corn is yellow
And how do we have NO DATA about the crops growing in any state?
Corn has consumed anyone who could answer.
0.4 and 0.7% are different colors, but 10 and 37% are the same
We are the children...of ethanol.
Why are you telling me which states have no data?
I thought this was about corn?
I don't agree with the color choice. Green would've been much nicer.
It all should have been shades of yellow.
Indiana Beach commercials did not lie to me after all!
Monocultures are environmentally devastating btw.
There is a massive swing in each of those colors.
Yeah, 10%, 20%, and 37% should each be ~~buffet~~ different colors.
Damn autocorrect
Really? Only 0.4%?
Because it sure feels like there's way more corn here than that.
If you’re referring to CA, it’s % of the entire state. Think of how much of CA is arid, mountainous, or otherwise unsuitable for corn or other agriculture.
You're probably seeing mostly grapes, tomatoes, cotton and cannabis, as well as grains that aren't corn?
I definitely see more corn than all of those other things combined. And it's not even for human consumption; it's for the cows.
I can't imagine 1/3 of everything you see in an entire state being corn.
Try driving through it. It's horrible.
Can confirm. I live in the Midwest.
Having lived in Chicagoland, what are the corn growing incentives there?! Every empty field in the city is full of corn. Seems smart.
load more comments
(1 replies)
if the numbers seem low dont forget about soy. and maybe wheat or alfalfa
Having flown over Iowa in a small plane many times this checks out
I'll be honest, I thought Ohio would be higher...
The other 87% of Ohio is soy beans
Drove through North Dakota once. It was all corn for hours. Absolutely stupid amounts.
view more: next ›