He's too liberal for the modern GOP.

Nancy said No.

Nowhere near enough fire and brimstone either

Dude spearheaded the anti-gun movement in California and raised taxes 5 times.

He's far-left by today's standards.

If that's the uniform, then I guess it checks out.

I used to say stuff like that. Now I'm old and I don't care. You know that old saying "I have never wished for a man's death, but I have read certain obituariesries with great pleasure?"

Yeah, that's not me, I wish for certain peoples' deaths all the time,AND read their obituaries with great pleasure.

Lindsey Graham's surprise death made my week!

I think the morality here is fine, but you're ignoring the reality of the harm that these people cause when you act like wishing death upon them is inherently immoral and contradictory to the belief that human beings are capable of and bettered by change.

Whether or not these things are true, these people are not going to change, either because they're dead and the damage is done, or because there is nothing that will force them to stop what they're doing besides that death. You're talking about people who advocate and facilitate genocide on the scale of millions, billions if you recognize the potential harm from climate change and their roles in defending capitalism against climate change mitigation. Yes, I wish death on them, because that cannot continue but will continue so long as this system exists and this system exists to maintain their positions of power. These people want to kill me personally (Charlie Kirk literally advocated for my genocide until his dying breath), and millions of others whom are also justified in prefering them dead over reformed. I don't care about an altruistically "ultimate" punishment, I care about not being killed brutally for no reason at all, and that doesn't require me to sacrifice the ideal that people can change.

Focusing on the idealistic underpinnings of these things exclusively is a tremendous sign of privilege as person who is not immediately affected by the actions that these men committed themselves to. Guess what, they won't repent or recognize their actions, not because of their "weak egos," but because this system privileges them and insulates them from the consequences of their actions and any retribution that may be inflicted on them as a symbolic challenge to this system. These men would rather die than change or lose that privilege, and they're killing on scales our brains can't even actually comprehend for much less than that. To act as though it is a sign of altruism yourself to value moral purity over the practical reality that their violence is only ended through their deaths is much more selfish than you seem to realize. Even further, I don't think you get to pick the ultimate punishment for someone who apparently hasn't threatened you the way they do me or the victims of their genocide. I don't care about punishment at all, but I certainly wouldn't refuse death or violence as a punishment to someone whose entire family was killed by these men, or whose ancestral home was uprooted and poisoned, or whose children have to live scared their entire lives, or who was raped as a child and then publicly shamed for resisting them.

Maybe apply some of that purported empathy to an understanding that the moral purity of some fucking powerful men is not more important than the victims of their violence or the justice they seek. And before you say some other shit about how you know better for the satisfaction of those victims, consider that they may never be able to heal until that desire for punishment is satisfied, and then explain why their healing is less important than these men healing from "evil."

Edit: This guy is a terrific example of how liberals will weaponize "morality" selectively to harm vulnerable groups. This is a person who does not view fascism or systemic violence as a problem, do not take their stance as coming from any genuine place of empathy or desire for the greater good.

But Charlie Kirk did. Just in a very roundabout way.

The junior fiddlers.

The War Criminals.

Never realized this gif was the Cain train himself.

Rush Limbaugh?

Gerald Ford. He gave Nixon a full pardon.

No it's one hundred percent real.