this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
570 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30573 readers
2763 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CNN refused to broadcast President Donald Trump's White House address on Thursday, July 16, after his "history of false statements."

After the move, CNN was hit with a wave of backlash from viewers as many found the move to be a form of censorship. On X, one person wrote, "Unbelievable and unacceptable, no more 'objectivity' CNN has no credibility……all news outlets should air any President live AND LET THEIR VIEWERS DECIDE THEIR OWN OPINIONS OF LIVE PRESIDENTS NATIONAL ADDRESSES."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 158 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"On X, one person wrote"

Come on guys...

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, modern journalism really seems to boil down to “what is Twitter posting about today?”

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are Nazis posting today?

Ftfy

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

They cannot leave the Nazi platform because they would be out of click bait served on a silver platter

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Welcome to modern news. Just wait until you find out a lot of it is written by AI

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 99 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Unbelievable and unacceptable, no more ‘objectivity’ CNN has no credibility……all news outlets should air any President live AND LET THEIR VIEWERS DECIDE THEIR OWN OPINIONS OF LIVE PRESIDENTS NATIONAL ADDRESSES.”

But these same assholes cheer when Obama is ignored and Biden's speech isn't broadcast.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If the viewers had the ability to discern propaganda and fake news from legitimate information, we would not have Trump as president.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (9 children)

If we had a unbiased, functional 4th estate we would not have Trump as president. Treating made up bullshit as "alternate facts" is partially why we are where we are.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

sort of, "Give me both sides of the argument and I'll decide for myself which one is right." That only works if both sides are at least trying to be accurate and thruthful.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats kind of like one of my former coworkers who would always tout he's one of the most informed people because he reads "both sides". And by that, it meant he'd look at articles posted to the libertarian forums, then glance at the headlines of something he doesn't agree with.

His car radio is tuned in to focks nooz

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I first heard that from the high schoolers who wanted lessons in both evolution and intelligent design so they could make up their own minds which one was right. -eye roll-

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That only works if both sides are at least trying to be accurate and thruthful.

It also requires an educated population who has the ability to use critical thinking.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They shoulda done a 5 min broadcast delay and run a fact-checking effort as pop-up video.

And a running count of proved-falsehoods.

Maybe a "minutes saying false things", a "minutes saying true things", and a "minutes not talking"; but the last one will be stuck at 0.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sign language girl in one bottom corner, fact checker calling out every lie on the other corner

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sounds like something the new and improved InfoWars would do

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That takes effort, energy, talent, concern, and integrity so you wouldn't really expect to see that on CNN.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

It has been 2 seconds since the last lie or deceptive statement.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 34 points 1 week ago

First of all, it's about time. I've been screaming that they should cut off the media oxygen to these Traitors since Kelly Anne Cryptkeeper started spewing her alternative facts early in the first dictatorship.

Second of all, too little too late CNN. This is just your last gasp before Ellison CBSs you, and turns you into another reliable mouthpiece for the Conservative Propaganda Machine.

BTW, CBS showed the speech, and gave it a substatial debrief afterwords.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

CNN sucks, but a broken clock is, indeed, correct twice a day. They aren't wrong here.

Again, fuck them, though. They aren't our allies. They side with the chucklefucks committing genocide and prostrsting themselves to Trump and his allies in fear.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah, and look at who owns them now. I'm honestly surprised they didn't air the presidential rant.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is actually pretty awesome. Major news channels not airing a freaking presidential address because even they know no good can come from him opening his ugly lying mouth.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Shoulda made this the policy when he first called Mexicans rapists and announced his run for presidency on day 1

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

history of ~~false statements~~ bad ratings

Like CNN has ever had a problem airing out a professional liar's bullshit.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're actually saying trump doesn't get ratings/attention?

That's astoundingly out of touch, if so.

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they're saying trump doesn't get ratings like he used to, which is why CNN has suddenly discovered this new aversion to his lying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archelon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Imagine if they’d done this in 2015.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Free market, bitch! If he wants to buy the air time, he can. No one stopped him from giving the speech and no one stopped the channels that aired it from doing so. That ain't censorship.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Magas have never been able to understand the concept that freedom of speech doesn't obligate any entity to platform whatever it is you are saying.

Ever since 2020 it's been "How do you know conservatives are being silenced? Because they never stop telling you."

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 8 points 1 week ago

“Don’t print lies in the newspaper” is one of the first rules of journalism.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

the same 'lack of' federal regulations that allows fox news to spew the bullshit and lies that they have for decades, is the same that allows cnn to not broadcast the dipshit's ~~speeches~~political ramblings.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Haha cry harder maga babies!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

And they were right on the spot.

Although, I have to admit, Trump's lies are easy to spot. He only needs to open his mouth or type something...

[–] forbiddencherry@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

Perhaps they expect they're all getting laid off once the Paramount deal closes, so they might as well.

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

More please.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Anyone who has been keeping an eye on the activities of the blatant Russian state sponsored bots on social media knows this already.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Heh. Excellent.

[–] Eddbopkins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Their own options are wrong. How can you agree with factually false statements and lies with no evidence to back up claims.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Tel Aviv Don?

load more comments
view more: next ›