this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
429 points (98.4% liked)

politics

30525 readers
2785 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Imagine being in a patheticism competition and your opponent is Pete Hegseth

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Sounds unwinnable to me.

[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 206 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I thought Idiocracy was supposed to be a movie

[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem with fucking idiots is that they’re always fucking other fucking idiots and creating more fucken fucking idiots!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I fucking hate this comparison.

The government in Idiocracy actually tried. They were just idiots. The bad guy in that movie is stupidity.

When these comparisons started that wasn't even a fair comparison. And I mean like, it was common enough when W. was still in office, among the like 10 people who had seen it by that time.

We have actively malicious state actors who love that you're so willing to believe they're only stupid.

Also Mike Judge is terrified of poor people.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

I mean... the bad guy in Idiocracy is actually "inferior genetics" and "the poors", Like... I find it hilarious but holy fuck did that movie do a lot for advancing eugenics among the cultural zeitgeist...

But yeah. President Comacho actually cared and was trying to make the world better. And once Not Sure showed them that toilet water worked, they used it. Rather than insisting on shoving horse medicine up their asses out of spite.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ryokimball@infosec.pub 124 points 1 week ago (1 children)

~~Forcing~~ Heavily recommending gender affirming care.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

Once again being so anti-trans they end up harming more cis people than trans people.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All these old MAGAts and fuckfaces take testosterone supplements so fucken much. The old owner of the company I work at was one of these dudes. Its all about being s teenager forever.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 135 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That sounds like gender affirming care. They should practice what they preach.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 50 points 1 week ago

They will stare deadpanned directly into your eyes and tell you its somehow not.

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Genuinely, it is gender affirming care. It's replacing sex hormones their body won't produce naturally, to counteract effects that are existentially devastating to their psyche.

They don't wanna say that low-T as an older man feels like gender dysphoria. But have a conversation with a trans guy and an old man about testosterone levels and masculinity and self-image, and you'll have almost the exact same complaint. "I just want to feel like the man I know I am inside."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

UPDATE: After taking all the responses to this into consideration, I now understand testosterone therapy to indeed be gender affirming care but Hegseth and the "Manosphere" crowd he identifies with prefer to affirm their gender by denying their age. They still want to be the "studs" they (thought) they were in high school. They're the same guys who wax nostalgically about their "glory days" when they were on the football team and how they "led the team to win the regionals"(but not state) and they "coulda gone pro" but one of "those people(you know who they're referring to)", "stole" their scholarship.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (8 children)

So they're affirming their desired gender ideal state?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Did they score 4 touchdowns in one game?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 74 points 1 week ago

I just can’t. No one ever suspected that there were a group of people who could be so fucking brain dead and stupid that it would become some sort of superpower. Like the dumbest most inept motherfuckers. MAGA are pedophiles accomplices and idiots of the highest order.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In other words, Pete Hegseth introduces mandatory gender-affirming tests as part of servicemember health evaluations.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (5 children)

How the fuck is this not The Onion

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He seems to be obsessed with the purity of bodily fluids, just like Jack D. Ripper. Even looks a little like him.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have to protect yourself that's why I only drink grain alcohol and rainwater.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One step away from penis inspection day

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yes, let’s also pump them full of methamphetamine and we’ll create good little Sturmtruppens to do the füeher’s bidding.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rogsson@piefed.social 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

u can’t make this shit up

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tea_n_typewriters@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Prioritizing testosterone makes a lot of sense when you’re an anthropomorphic scrotum.

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This guy is such a pussy. He overcompensates all the time and clearly has an inferiority complex. Must have a rather tiny penis to think being that macho is somehow important or a good thing. Probably an incel, too.

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He's an insult to pussies and penises alike. He's smooth down there, like a ken doll

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What the fuck is wrong with these people

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Whaaaaaaaat? The fuck is going on with toxic masculinity? The dudes are not ok

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

This is an aspect of totalitarianism. When a government attempts to subordinate all of society to a single ideology and state control. This is an attempt to elevate the idea of the strong, virile, white male as one of the solutions to all of our problems. It supports the approach in Iran where all we have to do is bomb them back to the stone age in order to "win". Another example is when Hegseth made all the generals come to Washington, in person, to dress them down, or to rename the Department of Defense to the Department of War, or to stop the promotion of women to higher ranks. Not only does it tie in nicely with the incompetence of the administration, because, what is the need for thinking through things or considering the consequences of actions when all you need is might, but it also serves as a distraction to the dangers happening behind the scenes like Russell Vought dismantling the federal government or the unimpeded creation of the surveillance state or the rise of unelected oligarchs who have far too much influence on society. And don't even get me started about the complete inability of the democrats to meet this moment.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Gender affirming care.

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In fairness, TBIs can cause long term testosterone deficiency. This isn't the worst idea for combat veterans... assuming that the reason is to get them proper medical care

Narrator: that was not the reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This guy beats women and more than likely rapes children

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chewypoops@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Low-T isn't even a real problem worth testing for like this. I'm not against testing for it when medically helpful, but the very public nature of this announcement sounds more like an attempt at signalling pro-masculine virtue rather than to tackle a real problem.

This nonsense is antithetical to a healthy military. Republicans always make the very self-destructive choice of using the military as a testing ground for their weird ideas, in a way that disincentivises employment with it.

When they wanted to purge trans people, they started with the military, because it was the biggest thing they had any control over. Lots of talented people left for the private sector with damage to morale as well. Now they're projecting their male fragility delusions onto the military in hopes that they can become more masculine and therefore "strong".

None of this does anything to make the military better at what it does. It's like Hegseth looked at UFC fighters (some of the most useless dumbasses in existence) and decided they were even stronger than our troops. It's like the military has low confidence in its sexuality, and is overcompensating. It's a bizarre look.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] diablicja@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

What a fucking weirdo.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Walking right up to the line of mandatoring "gender hormone therapy"...

While the screenings will be mandatory for eligible service members, Hegseth said that any resulting treatment would remain voluntary. "If treatment is recommended, it's entirely your choice to receive testosterone replacement therapy," he said.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago

...this is the onion, right? ..right?

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

That is some seriously tiny dick energy.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I thought this was the Onion. WTF?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago

Gotta love it when evil assholes sabotage themselves.

load more comments
view more: next ›